RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > ctek mxs5.0 |
|
|
Col Member Since: 02 Sep 2012 Location: Hawkes Bay NZ Posts: 4969 |
Yes but, you need to connect the Live/Red Lead to the Battery and the Earth/Black lead to one of the Earth Studs due to the Battery Monitoring System, there are Several Studs on the inner wing valance close to the battery.
|
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 6:46pm |
|
Col Member Since: 02 Sep 2012 Location: Hawkes Bay NZ Posts: 4969 |
The 2011 set up is different to the RRS 2 and does not have the separate Jump Start/ Booster terminal/connectors under the bonnet.
|
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 7:32pm |
|
JanRRS Member Since: 29 Dec 2015 Location: in my car ... Posts: 41 |
Cheers Col.
|
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 7:48pm |
|
Col Member Since: 02 Sep 2012 Location: Hawkes Bay NZ Posts: 4969 |
Hi,
|
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 8:12pm |
|
JanRRS Member Since: 29 Dec 2015 Location: in my car ... Posts: 41 |
this video might be very useful:
|
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 9:00pm |
|
Johnski Member Since: 02 Sep 2015 Location: North Wales & North Yorkshire Posts: 1407 |
I asked my good lady to get me the CTEK MXS 5.0 as a present, (do some 2 mile runs a couple of times a day) she duly ordered it, but it was out of stock, so unknown to me, she purchased what I believe may be the next model up, the MXS 7.0. Could anyone confirm this is still OK to charge after short runs etc, and that connections to car/battery are the same as the 5.0 you have all been discussing? Also what's the difference between the two? Thank you. John
|
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 9:30pm |
|
Col Member Since: 02 Sep 2012 Location: Hawkes Bay NZ Posts: 4969 |
Actually the 7.0 is a better option not that you need it but it can act as a power source as well, it connect in exactly the some way as a 5.0.
|
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 9:34pm |
|
fdhadi Member Since: 17 Feb 2015 Location: Wigan Posts: 180 |
Thanks for that Col. |
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 9:35pm |
|
Johnski Member Since: 02 Sep 2015 Location: North Wales & North Yorkshire Posts: 1407 |
Thanks from me to Col, saves a lot of research and checking. John
|
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 9:42pm |
|
Col Member Since: 02 Sep 2012 Location: Hawkes Bay NZ Posts: 4969 |
No problem Guy's, if you have a look through my gallery If I remember right I think there are a couple of photos of the terminals I used to connect mine.
|
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 9:44pm |
|
Johnski Member Since: 02 Sep 2015 Location: North Wales & North Yorkshire Posts: 1407 |
I will check that out, great thanks. John
|
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 9:46pm |
|
JanRRS Member Since: 29 Dec 2015 Location: in my car ... Posts: 41 |
As far as I have been told by the dealer, the 5.0 is ideal for the RRS. The 7.0 (to 225 Ah) and the 10.0 (to 300 Ah) are for bigger batteries, i.e. caravans, etc ... And more for professional use. And obviously do cost more. I would just stick to the 5.0, which does the job perfectly. I have been using it for both my BMW X6 and my Porsche 4S. And use it also for my HD bike. |
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 10:07pm |
|
fkarim Member Since: 14 Apr 2012 Location: London Posts: 2216 |
5, 7, 10 and even 25 are all suitable for RRS. It's just that higher current means quicker charging. Plus as Col said 7 and upwards offer the power supply mode which can be very useful when a stable, uninterrupted 12v supply is needed for example when editing and uploading the CCF file to configure the car.
|
||
Sun Jun 26 2016 10:23pm |
|
JOCK55 Member Since: 01 Sep 2015 Location: INVERNESS Posts: 415 |
Just as a final point regarding length of charge, my neighbour owns a Shogun. He works in the marine industry and does 4 months on / 4 months off rotations. When he goes away he puts his car on a maintenance charge with a CTEK 7.0 for the full 4 months he is away and has never had a problem!
|
||
Mon Jun 27 2016 10:35am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis