Citizen55
Member Since: 14 Dec 2015
Location: Rollin' in my Five point O (well, 4.2)
Posts: 55
![](templates/vbnew/images/spacer.gif)
|
This will really seem like a daft question, and at least will probably give some of you a chuckle, but I have a question about the fuel tank shape in the RRS S/C - is it tapered, so it's smaller at the bottom??
Seriously,
I get about 100 miles from full, to the 3/4 mark. (I think, great 400 miles on a tank!, even though the trip computer range says otherwise)
Then from 3/4 to 1/2, its about 50 miles.
Then 1/2 to 1/4 seems another 40 miles.
What on earth is going on? I don't think I am driving that differently after the first 1/4 tank is gone, perhaps a little harder, but surely not to double fuel consumption.
I admit, when I fuel up, I top it off - so when the pump clicks off, I top it up until I can see the petrol itself. That's about 4 litres, so I theoretically could get another 12-15 miles more with a 'full' tank if you know what I mean.
Anyways, thoughts? Am I going mad? 2006 Range Rover Sport 4.2 s/c with Arden bodykit
|
Tue Apr 19 2016 12:02pm |
|
Andrew
Member Since: 16 Jun 2005
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 248
![](templates/vbnew/images/spacer.gif)
|
I agree the bottom half goes quicker, I expect part of the reason is, if you let the range go to zero, fuel light on for around 40 miles, gauge at nothing, then filled up, you would not get anywhere near 100 litres in, and the tank is meant to be 105!
try it next time
so there is another 15 litres from the bottom half that the gauge knows nothing about...
Andrew 5.0 Ltr Superchrged RRS2, Chile Red, Sideways out of junctions!
TDV8 HST Stornaway on a 08.. remapped.. now gone and replaced, was a mighty fine car..
4.2 SC First Edition when they first came out, quick car!
|
Tue Apr 19 2016 9:18pm |
|