RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General (L494) > Potnetial owner - fuel range |
|
|
wilf Member Since: 08 Nov 2012 Location: on the naughty step Posts: 939 |
I certainly don't drive for economy and have seen 520miles from a tank on a decent run, so with your usage and driving style 600 is a possibility.
|
||
Wed Mar 22 2017 8:43pm |
|
mikef Member Since: 16 Sep 2013 Location: bucks Posts: 313 |
I guess you might see close to 600 miles if you drive gently. My trip computer generally shows a range of around 500-550 miles after I fill up and again according to my trip computer I'm averaging about 33-34mpg with a mix of motorway, urban and rural driving but I certainly dont drive specifically to save fuel |
||
Wed Mar 22 2017 9:33pm |
|
Humbug Member Since: 01 Aug 2014 Location: East Anglia Posts: 48 |
After 60k miles in a '63 plate HSE – virtually no urban but quite a lot of short/off-road journeys and a fair bit faster than you on long journeys – I've never managed more than 500 miles on a tank or achieved a real 30mpg (which shows as 34mpg on the computer). I generally wait till single-figure range showing to fill up but have never got more than 75 litres into the tank (supposedly 80 litres) and that after sitting on 0 range for too long. Over whole life a tank averages 440 miles from 70 litres.
|
||
Thu Mar 23 2017 11:40am |
|
Bill Portland Member Since: 01 Feb 2017 Location: Dorsetshire Posts: 387 |
"Over whole life a tank averages 440 miles from 70 litres. "
|
||
Thu Mar 23 2017 1:14pm |
|
RR Ally Member Since: 28 Nov 2015 Location: Kings Lynn Posts: 59 |
After 15k miles in my2016 SDV6 (306HP) I regularly see 500 miles on a tank when on long trips, but as others have said short runs or hard acceleration will hit the MPG hard. |
||
Thu Mar 23 2017 1:51pm |
|
WelshHope Member Since: 22 Mar 2017 Location: Caerdydd Posts: 2 |
Thanks All for the feedback. Provides me with some clarity for a potential purchase. More concerned about having to refuel twice in the weekdays - yet not a deal breaker.
|
||
Thu Mar 23 2017 9:30pm |
|
alexa111s Member Since: 27 Jun 2016 Location: Sevenoaks Posts: 62 |
OK, I wouldn't be so confident. Not sure how many people have MY17 on this post, but I've never seen more than an indicated 463 miles. AND... the absolute crux of the matter is that the fuel tank is NOT 86 Litres as advertised. The maximum the tank will take is 73 .5 litres of fuel even when its got 2 miles indicated. Land Rover are looking into this for me, but the technicians agree that it simply can't be the size they claim. We tried 2 other MY17 cars and I borrowed one and drove it 500 miles and did a trip driving like miss daisy and somehow got 42mpg indicated. Guess what? Only 463 miles range showed up and 72 litres went in. They tell me half a gallon, so only 2.5 litres or so left in tank at zero miles. So its a 75 litres tank. Take into account that all LR cars show 15-20% incorrect MPG figures and the fact is that the real world MPG of this car 306bhp SDV6 engine is about 25mpg. Maybe you could scrape 30mpg.
|
||
Sat Mar 25 2017 10:44pm |
|
wilf Member Since: 08 Nov 2012 Location: on the naughty step Posts: 939 |
MY 16, yes, did the tank change for 17? I have seen range north of 500 frequently, and have put more than 80 litres into it more than once. 83 was my max. MY2016 HSE D SDV6 - gone due to fuel dilution problems.
|
||
Sun Mar 26 2017 5:29am |
|
alexa111s Member Since: 27 Jun 2016 Location: Sevenoaks Posts: 62 |
wilf - it must have as trust me.. it's impossible to get more than 73 litres in the car. I've tried 2 others as well (demo cars) and it's just same. They said - maybe its the adblue ? I was like.. that's a different tank. Then they said the baffle that's now standard.. etc... that's not gonna take up 10 litres. Its a joke to be honest and they still advertise a 768 miles range based on the fantasy land combined figure. I actually think the MY17 is worse fuel economy than the MY14/15 cars with 292bhp that were meant to be less efficient. My old mans car we got a range of 620 miles the other day and also put in 84 litres..
|
||
Sun Mar 26 2017 8:03am |
|
wilf Member Since: 08 Nov 2012 Location: on the naughty step Posts: 939 |
Mine has AdBlue so its not that.
|
||
Sun Mar 26 2017 9:43am |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 |
This might be a fairy story but I was told by a dealership that the fuel tank size was reduced because of the Ad-Blue additive but not for any other reason than had they slapped a 10ltr tank into the car and left the fuel tank the same size then the vehicle weight would have increased which would mean retesting for emission etc etc............. so the fuel tank size was reduced to keep the vehicle weight the same. I cannot see how 10kg or so would make a difference but apparrantly it does.
|
||
Sun Mar 26 2017 1:01pm |
|
matsoutback Member Since: 13 Jul 2016 Location: Queensland Posts: 152 |
To me this is a pretty serious situation.
|
||
Tue Mar 28 2017 1:36pm |
|
wilf Member Since: 08 Nov 2012 Location: on the naughty step Posts: 939 |
I can't believe the AdBlue rationale - as I said mine has that and the larger fuel tank. But it is a MY16 car.
|
||
Tue Mar 28 2017 1:57pm |
|
IRBails Member Since: 22 Nov 2013 Location: Wollongong Posts: 867 |
I love my SVD8 105 litre tank, no add blue easy 600 mile range when travelling and good performance. Get the SVD8 and all will be good. M16 SVD8 ,4.4 HSE with a few extras, Sold R50 , Wife SQ5 , BMW R1200GSW. |
||
Tue Mar 28 2017 11:31pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis