RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
![]() | Home > Wheels & Tyres > 275 45 20 Grabber A/T fitted |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
Buckster Member Since: 05 Mar 2015 Location: Hampshire Posts: 1656 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
||
![]() |
|
Fish Member Since: 29 Jan 2014 Location: Glasgow Posts: 60 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi,
|
||
![]() |
|
Buckster Member Since: 05 Mar 2015 Location: Hampshire Posts: 1656 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Fish,
|
||
![]() |
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 15 Jan 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 1477 ![]() ![]() |
The speedo would be under reading by about 3.6%. Given that it will be set to over read a little, I wouldn't think this would be an issue if you keep it in mind (In fact, it will probably give a closer reading to the true speed). |
||
![]() |
|
Fish Member Since: 29 Jan 2014 Location: Glasgow Posts: 60 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, the error is quite big, just had a look at an on line tyre bible and it look like I would need to get 275x45x19 to get a rolling circumference with an error of just 0.29%.
|
||
![]() |
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 15 Jan 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 1477 ![]() ![]() |
I wouldn't worry about it. Look at it this way; If you're speedo were 100% accurate (which it won't be), then when it's reading 70, you'd be doing about 72.52 - Well below the 10% + 2mph suggested (and it is only suggested) tolerance used by the police. |
||
![]() |
|
Fish Member Since: 29 Jan 2014 Location: Glasgow Posts: 60 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
||
![]() |
|
wastower Member Since: 12 Sep 2013 Location: Dunoon Posts: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi
|
||
![]() |
|
Buckster Member Since: 05 Mar 2015 Location: Hampshire Posts: 1656 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oxymoron |
||
![]() |
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 15 Jan 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 1477 ![]() ![]() |
Yes, with the excellent tread life and less noticable economy decreases reported, it's never a bad choice. |
||
![]() |
|
Zilch Member Since: 20 Mar 2006 Location: Sydney, sometimes the Whitsundays Posts: 2835 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
there is another thread on the GG AT's in the Off Roading section, just to say i have found them
|
||
![]() |
|
Buckster Member Since: 05 Mar 2015 Location: Hampshire Posts: 1656 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the heads up Zilch |
||
![]() |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 9022 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One thing I have found with the GG AT is that it seems to be susceptible to embedding of stones in the tread blocks. Not just in the sipes but the actual rubber itself.
|
||
![]() |
|
Buckster Member Since: 05 Mar 2015 Location: Hampshire Posts: 1656 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I haven't noticed any stones embedded in the actual rubber yet but it seems to attract lots in the tread block sipes as you say. I'm amazed they can make a tyre that has such soft rubber yet last so long!? |
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
![](../images/layout/footer/disclaimer.gif)