RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Maintenance & Modifications > Is this the next step for the S/C |
|
|
RRUK Member Since: 10 Jun 2005 Location: Leicestershire Posts: 2581 |
A 4.4 surely would not be that much different, mind you they are different engines, I think I'd prefer the 4.2 still as it is at least proven in Supercharged form in the Jaguars.
|
||
Tue Nov 01 2005 6:36pm |
|
Martin Site Administrator & Owner Member Since: 26 May 2005 Location: Hook Norton Posts: 3662 |
I think that the 4.2 SC engine is basically the same engine as the 4.4 but the capacity decrease is due to the strengthened engine internals (thicker cylinder liners I believe) to cope with the extra pressures due to supercharging. Correct me if I'm wrong though! Like this site? Buy some RRSPORT goodies to show your support! |
||
Tue Nov 01 2005 6:47pm |
|
RRUK Member Since: 10 Jun 2005 Location: Leicestershire Posts: 2581 |
Not sure, I presumed perhaps wrongly that the 4.4 was the current BMW version with a hooter strapped on.
|
||
Tue Nov 01 2005 6:51pm |
|
Martin Site Administrator & Owner Member Since: 26 May 2005 Location: Hook Norton Posts: 3662 |
I think LR have got rid of BMW engines in the Range Rovers (including the Sport) now apart from the TD6 in the 'big' RR - the petrols are all Jaguar derived. Like this site? Buy some RRSPORT goodies to show your support! |
||
Tue Nov 01 2005 7:00pm |
|
MDP Member Since: 14 Jun 2005 Location: Back in an AUDI Posts: 8598 |
You ar absolutely right Martin.. I think " WITH MORE EXTRAS THAN A HOLLYWOOD EPIC " |
||
Wed Nov 02 2005 12:25am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis