RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General (L494) > RRS2 OR X5 |
|
|
AA4X4 Member Since: 18 Mar 2014 Location: Bedford Posts: 22 |
Like it 2001 Black Porsche 911 turbo 2010 Black BMW 325d Coupe 2006 Shogun (wifeys car) 2013 Honda Fireblade 1000RR Superbike |
||
Wed Apr 02 2014 11:33am |
|
andman Member Since: 08 Oct 2011 Location: la vella Posts: 1155 |
The X5 is a good car for sure and the infotainment is superior.....
|
||
Thu Apr 03 2014 3:28am |
|
AA4X4 Member Since: 18 Mar 2014 Location: Bedford Posts: 22 |
Very True andman - you have probably just knocked the nail on the head.
|
||
Thu Apr 03 2014 8:27am |
|
andman Member Since: 08 Oct 2011 Location: la vella Posts: 1155 |
So I hit the nail on the head.... and are you of the fence yet... or clinging on for dear life..... 2014.5 SDV6 AB Dynamic ... Fuji /Santorini Pan roof and 22's
|
||
Thu Apr 03 2014 11:15pm |
|
mikef Member Since: 16 Sep 2013 Location: bucks Posts: 313 |
I too have had loads of BMWs including an E70 X5 3.0sd. I currently drive a L322 FFRR and have a RRS HSE SDV6 on order. My X5 was exactly what it said on the tin, a 5 series estate on stilts with a basic 4WD system. It wasn't screwed together particularly well (they're built in the US not Germany) and had a surprising number of squeaks and rattles which irritated me badly in the end. Also it wasn't particularly frugal either averaging about 26mpg and it was also surprisingly unrefined with a clattery engine and quite a bit of wind noise. I understand the latest F15 model is better in this respect. One major difference between the X5 and the RRS is the suspension. My X5 rode on steel springs and had runflat tyres and the ride was frankly dreadful; I changed the runflats for normal tyres in the end and that improved the ride a bit. Again I understand that the F15 model is improved in this area but it still hasn't got the sophisticated air suspension of the RRS and for me, this is one of the major reasons for going for a RRS. The new RRS has a sporty drive but it still has a compliant and quiet ride.
|
||
Fri Apr 04 2014 10:00pm |
|
BlackGT3 Member Since: 23 Aug 2013 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 46 |
If you can wait for a Sept delivery (2015MY), their should be a new Infotainment system which will evidently be class leading! Current:
|
||
Fri Apr 04 2014 11:10pm |
|
andman Member Since: 08 Oct 2011 Location: la vella Posts: 1155 |
Where did you hear that BlackGT3.... I will happily delay my order for that.......
|
||
Sat Apr 05 2014 7:13am |
|
philmw Member Since: 18 Aug 2006 Location: Nottingham Posts: 1671 |
Although there is no guarantee of either (ICE or September). |
||
Sat Apr 05 2014 7:15am |
|
Disco_Mikey Member Since: 08 Apr 2012 Location: Dundee, Scotland Posts: 4395 |
I also spent some time driving the new RRS at Dunkeld, at the launch event at Gleneagles Where the new RRS will go off road, on standard road tyres, is incredible Got speaking to one of the instructors there on the day. Said they took it round a fairly challenging course, but the car breezed it. So they actually had to make a special section in the forest to demonstrate the abilities of the car. He even went on to say, to get a Defender up the same course, you would need front and rear locking diffs, huge mud tyres, and a suspension lift. The RRS done it all on 21" road tyres I expect it would go much further off road than almost any 4x4 you could throw at it |
||
Sat Apr 05 2014 8:03am |
|
drdelrrs Member Since: 02 Nov 2010 Location: UK Posts: 1163 |
^^^^ Yes - but at somewhere over £80k it's probably only LR that can afford to mend them after they've thrashed them cross country.
|
||
Sat Apr 05 2014 2:02pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8980 |
I've wondered about warranty claims and off road use. There's no way that LR would use off road use as an excuse because it would be totally contrary to their whole USP. They claim the vehicles are the best 4x4 and advertise them in off road situations. Imagine the negative publicity they'd get if they tried to say that off road use wasn't covered. They get crucified by the car media. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
|
||
Sat Apr 05 2014 5:18pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8980 |
Presumably approach/departure angles weren't an issue then. The one thing the Defender has in its favour is the amazingly small overhangs. One thing that annoys me about the LR days is that the demo vehicles have locking rear diffs when almost no one ever specs these. So the vehicles that people play with are more capable than what they think they're buying. Sure, in some cases the rear diff won't make a difference but in marginal conditions it could be the difference between breezing through and struggling/failing. My view is that the locking rear diff should be a standard fit - I guess for many it will be now that the Dynamic and AB get the active rear diff system as standard. About time too. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders 2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed |
||
Sat Apr 05 2014 5:23pm |
|
fkarim Member Since: 14 Apr 2012 Location: London Posts: 2216 |
This is from the warranty policy document:
I wonder if they classify off road leisure use (e.g. using a "Pay & Play" site) as any of the above |
||
Sat Apr 05 2014 8:20pm |
|
mikef Member Since: 16 Sep 2013 Location: bucks Posts: 313 |
Yes you're right. The RRS that I drove was the Dynamic model and it was equipped with a locking rear diff which was certainly operating in the worst of the conditions we encountered. I have ordered a standard HSE model with the optional Off Road pack and I assumed that the locking rear diff was part of this pack. Is this not correct? The car I drove was also fitted with 20" wheels and Michelin Latitude tyres which I was told was one of the standard fit types |
||
Sat Apr 05 2014 9:49pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis