RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Fuel consumtion for RRS 2.7 TDV6 2007 |
|
|
chrisebabes Member Since: 14 Jul 2010 Location: Cornwall Posts: 79 |
Let us know about the remap, may take the plunge also TDV8 2007 window tints, side steps. |
||
Wed Aug 28 2013 6:44pm |
|
fkarim Member Since: 14 Apr 2012 Location: London Posts: 2216 |
Keeping climate control on all the time works much better in cars with 4 zones or even if the 2 zones are front and rear rather than right and left. |
||
Wed Aug 28 2013 7:45pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8958 |
I usually have climate set to the same temp on each side of the vehicle. It works very nicely. I find the split temperatures across the vehicle don't work so well. Bit of a gimmick in my view... 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
|
||
Wed Aug 28 2013 11:14pm |
|
fkarim Member Since: 14 Apr 2012 Location: London Posts: 2216 |
The point is, if the rear passengers want a different temperature than the front, you can't leave climate control on permanently.
|
||
Thu Aug 29 2013 5:09am |
|
Coxylad Member Since: 11 Jul 2013 Location: Preston Posts: 48 |
if you drive with the air con off and use BP ultimate or shell nitro+ you will notice a big rise in fuel consumption
|
||
Thu Aug 29 2013 9:24am |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8958 |
Can't help thinking that driving a 2.5t 4x4 and worrying about fuel consumption are mutually exclusive. If fuel use is an issue then buy a different vehicle. Turning off climate control just to save a few quid seems to me to make owning a luxury vehicle rather pointless. But perhaps it's just me... 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
|
||
Thu Aug 29 2013 10:17am |
|
Beancounter_74 Member Since: 11 Oct 2011 Location: Down here now... Posts: 5796 |
^^^^ Agree ON THE WAY: BMW F21 M140i
|
||
Thu Aug 29 2013 10:18am |
|
Coxylad Member Since: 11 Jul 2013 Location: Preston Posts: 48 |
Im not switching mine off to save fuel im just trying to see what fuel consumption i am getting with diferant fuel types and driving with air con on dons not give u the correct consumption 2007 RANGE ROVER SPORT 2.7 TDV6 HSE in silver |
||
Thu Aug 29 2013 11:20am |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8958 |
As an academic exercise, fair enough. But if you usually have AC on anyway, you may as well test the various fuels with it on to give a proper real-world consumption figure. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
|
||
Thu Aug 29 2013 2:33pm |
|
mse Member Since: 08 Mar 2011 Location: Warwickshire Posts: 2916 |
Dont they design newer cars to have the climate control on without impacting MPG almost at all...back in the 90's you would loose 1 or 2 MPG, now you might loose .1 or.2mpg if at all
|
||
Thu Aug 29 2013 2:46pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8958 |
I believe newer systems somehow clutch the pump in and out as required rather than run it flat out all of the time.
|
||
Thu Aug 29 2013 4:16pm |
|
mse Member Since: 08 Mar 2011 Location: Warwickshire Posts: 2916 |
I definitely saw a drop in MPG by 1 or so when i ran it last winter...but i didnt care, i was warmer in the mornings
|
||
Thu Aug 29 2013 5:13pm |
|
IDB Member Since: 09 May 2013 Location: Chorley, Lancs Posts: 18 |
re trip to oxfrod and back, I have always found the indicated mpg to be pretty much spot on when compared with actually working out the consuption and this trip was no different. Must have the only accurate computer out there. This makes a refreshing change as i had SAAB before this and it was miles out.
|
||
Thu Aug 29 2013 5:52pm |
|
fkarim Member Since: 14 Apr 2012 Location: London Posts: 2216 |
Like most RRS owners I too realised before buying that large fuel bills will be inevitable (but worth it). This is probably the first or second time I have bothered to calculate consumption based on fill ups/mileage. I do keep an eye on the computer mpg though. Not because I "worry" about how much fuel is being spent but so that I can spot any significant anomaly as it could be a sign of a mechanical problem which I would want to pre-emptively address. Just surprised how inaccurate the computer can be. |
||
Thu Aug 29 2013 6:36pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis