RRSPORT.CO.UK

    Forum   Gallery   Shop   Sponsors
Home > General (L494) > Just Ordered! :o)
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 6 of 6 <123456
 
SDV6RRS



Member Since: 08 May 2013
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 52

United Kingdom 

Quote:
60:40 is different to the fold flat load space - just make sure.


This seems to be mentioned a lot here, but the only option I can see is the "Load Through" and that is a panel in the centre of the rear seats for putting things like skis through, nothing to do with making the seats go fully flat.

The seats going fully flat however is concerning me a bit - In the FFRR, they are miles from flat (worse than my X5) when folded, unlike the current RRS where you lift the squab and so you get a fully flat load area.

Looking at the pictures, the RRS rear seats look just like the FFRR, which to me indicates they won't go fully down Sad

However, the only hope is one of the pictures of the 5+2 seating in the brochure, the access seat does appear to be fully flat.

Happy to be proven wrong, but that's my assessment.

Post #382688 Fri May 10 2013 10:54am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 08 Mar 2011
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 2916

United Kingdom 

Quote:
60:40 Folding Rear Seats with Load Through

The seats operate a 60/40 split. However, when you need that added bit of extra room for a larger load, the bench seat can be folded to allow increased stowage and offer maximum convenience.


To me this is clear - they dont fold flat without the option to fold the bench Mike

2014 Facelift Discovery

Post #382698 Fri May 10 2013 2:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RRSTDV8



Member Since: 12 Aug 2011
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 8980

United Kingdom 2012 Range Rover Sport SDV6 HSE Orkney Grey

That's my reading of it too mse. If you don't have the option ticked then the seat backs fold forward but the seat base doesn't move.

Again, the fact that this sort of thing is an option is just disgraceful; especially on a vehicle that is supposed to be a utility vehicle - that's what the U is in SUV after all... 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed

Post #382711 Fri May 10 2013 4:26pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Cpd1



Member Since: 30 Mar 2013
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 59

Owner's manual up on Topix now. Doesn't mention a folding base it seems.

http://topix.landrover.jlrext.com/topix/se...f8e3b6d21#

Post #382818 Sun May 12 2013 5:50am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
corrisgrey



Member Since: 13 Apr 2013
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 145

United Kingdom 

Cpd1 wrote:
Owner's manual up on Topix now. Doesn't mention a folding base it seems.

http://topix.landrover.jlrext.com/topix/se...f8e3b6d21#


The through load option usually involves a separate folding middle seat to take skis and long narrow things, which is what I originally thought it was in the new RRS. Why complicate production with two different rear seat structures?

Post #382823 Sun May 12 2013 7:29am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 08 Mar 2011
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 2916

United Kingdom 

Cost i would suggest.

The manual highlights that some lessons learnt from the current run - but equally doesnt show much earth shattering additional things, the no spare wheel for what i assume 7 seat options is funny Mike

2014 Facelift Discovery


Last edited by mse on Sun May 12 2013 10:02pm. Edited 1 time in total

Post #382830 Sun May 12 2013 9:47am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RRSTDV8



Member Since: 12 Aug 2011
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 8980

United Kingdom 2012 Range Rover Sport SDV6 HSE Orkney Grey

Interesting that the tyres have deep sidewalls (65%) in the "smaller" wheel sizes. Of course most will have the 22 inch rims of course so it's a bit moot. Should make for a nice ride on the smaller wheels though. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed

Post #382890 Sun May 12 2013 9:19pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Baron



Member Since: 23 Jun 2005
Location: Southener
Posts: 529

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Sport TDV8 HSE Zermatt Silver

RRSTDV8 wrote:
Interesting that the tyres have deep sidewalls (65%) in the "smaller" wheel sizes. Of course most will have the 22 inch rims of course so it's a bit moot. Should make for a nice ride on the smaller wheels though.


Grabber AT 19"

Best ride, grip and wear Smile  SDV8 vogue SE.
Corris grey and ivory leather + most of the toys.
Limited edition RRS model number 0001 Smile
Gone TDV8 RR Sport. Never to be forgotten.

Wife has an i8 BMW

Post #382898 Sun May 12 2013 10:39pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 6 of 6 <123456
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
RRSPORT.CO.UK RSS Feed - All Forums

Switch to Mobile site