RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General (L494) > Just Ordered! :o) |
|
|
jim4244 Member Since: 16 Feb 2012 Location: No Posts: 1210 |
Hmmmmm........well I think that I will have a look at the new model BMW X5 when it comes out later this year. It should be way cheaper, more economical and greener than the new RRS. I also hear that VW will be revamping their 4X4 range.
|
||
Mon May 06 2013 3:36pm |
|
mse Member Since: 08 Mar 2011 Location: Warwickshire Posts: 2916 |
Same for me...ive been a fan of the sport since concept and when i first drove it...love it aspired to get one, had four, owned two - doubt ill have the next generation which is sad. Not worked out the next move yet...some options being worked through, looks like the new sport is only in about 2% likelihood.
no problem - totally agree (well i prefer mine if you know what i mean ) @ Jim I wouldnt go a BMW route - but thats me. Im of a similar view and there is no way i would spend the cash to get less or spend more cash to get the same...that was the nail in the coffin. Whats worrying is im sure it will sell...just a load of people wont realise etc etc etc Mike 2014 Facelift Discovery |
||
Mon May 06 2013 6:03pm |
|
Brian Mason Member Since: 31 Aug 2006 Location: Lurking with intent!!! Posts: 5326 |
Agreed. Not just the ridiculous price-tag but it's also lost that rugged, manly appeal that made it what it was. It looks like something intended for the husband whose the missus has got an Evoque.,,. a matching "His & Hers" in the driveway??? Anyway, nothing immediately comes to mind to fill the slot left by the current RRS. It's a shame the FFRR has eaten too may pies and comes with an equally absurd price-tag or that would be the natural successor, even though it's bigger than a Transit van. Not a fan of the X5 as had one and didn't like it and the Porsche Cayenne is another lard-arse. So, unless you're a hairdresser, what's the real hetrosexual alternative to the new Evoque XL, sorry, RRS??? MY12 SDV6 HSE Sumatra/Ebony/Piano/Sidesteps/Privacy/Overfinch Olympus/JLR DRLs |
||
Mon May 06 2013 7:09pm |
|
Renaco Member Since: 28 Jul 2011 Location: Bavaria Posts: 324 |
+1 |
||
Mon May 06 2013 7:37pm |
|
mse Member Since: 08 Mar 2011 Location: Warwickshire Posts: 2916 |
Totally agree...so much missing in the new rrs, so many little things to make a large set of problems
|
||
Mon May 06 2013 8:04pm |
|
DBA Member Since: 20 Mar 2013 Location: Skopje Posts: 51 |
Former Defender, FFRR and Discovery owners probably had the same comment aboutbthe current RRS... Now they are driving an Evoque and are pretty happy with it... I love the the ne RRS, and one of the reasons is that it looks like a big Evoque. Evoque good looks and FFRR quaility of materials, better offroading capabilities then the current RRS, better handling? And dont argue that the handling is not important, it is called Sport after all.... Automobile Magazine had put this nicely: ...So you climb into the driver's seat, noting its Italian-supercar look before you settle in, and you eyeball a cabin that owes some of its aesthetic to the Evoque but its quality of construction and material to the new Range Rover, and in turn to a Bentley. You sit lower than in the outgoing Sport but still higher than in the rivals for that hallmark Land Rover "command" driving position. The exterior has also swapped its boxy, slightly militaristic look for something slipperier and more elegant but your view out still includes those classic Range Rover "castellated" corners. Read more: http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/drive...XrHijE4... |
||
Mon May 06 2013 8:15pm |
|
mse Member Since: 08 Mar 2011 Location: Warwickshire Posts: 2916 |
DBa...the problem is things like, it not having low and full terrain response as standard, other simple and important things are missing there seems to be a big list. Making the core offering less/worse than in past models.
|
||
Mon May 06 2013 10:33pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8980 |
I don't like the fact that it looks like a fat Evoque. The new RRS will have lesser off road capabilities than the old one unless you spec the off road pack to get the 2 speed transfer box. Sure, the new 850mm wading depth and better ground clearance are useful but not if you can't get anywhere to make use of them. On road handling will, I'm sure, be better than the old RRS because of the weight loss and the fact that they've started out to build a Cayenne/X5 competitor. I find my Sport's handling suits its use - I don't chuck it around like a hot hatch because it isn't one. I try to carry speed and make use of the decent torque to make progress. And don't get me started on Land Rover's insulting idea of charging £2k for a bloody tow bar! Thule need to figure out how to make an aftermarket bar for this vehicle. They could sell it for a grand and make a killing! 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders 2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed |
||
Mon May 06 2013 10:34pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8980 |
Save up for a FFRR or go somewhere else I suppose. BMW must be rubbing their hands at the thought of disenfranchised LR drivers looking for something other than the new RRS... 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders 2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed |
||
Mon May 06 2013 10:38pm |
|
mse Member Since: 08 Mar 2011 Location: Warwickshire Posts: 2916 |
Oh it's wider and longer...that's just what I thought it needed, there was loads of space in the car parks!
|
||
Mon May 06 2013 10:58pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8980 |
I wonder if the inclusion of the extra seats in the RRS is a pointer to the Disco being moved in to a more utilitarian position in the range. More like the commercial version as standard perhaps. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
|
||
Mon May 06 2013 11:46pm |
|
mse Member Since: 08 Mar 2011 Location: Warwickshire Posts: 2916 |
Also to bridge the gap between those that feel the disco is below them...but have massive families? Mike
|
||
Tue May 07 2013 9:33am |
|
BKHK Member Since: 05 May 2008 Location: Perth Posts: 1941 |
I am looking at the new RRS for when it comes here. Actually, I have a meaningless small deposit down for one. The spec would suit me, I don't go off road or drive beyond the metro area (that what planes are for) so if its a bit dumbed down off road wise, no problem. Right now for all my road driving + the occasional winery gravel drive, my X5 4.0D is a great car.
|
||
Tue May 07 2013 10:18am |
|
mse Member Since: 08 Mar 2011 Location: Warwickshire Posts: 2916 |
Wait till you see it, you will think evoque xl not rrs or sport ffrr
|
||
Tue May 07 2013 3:10pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis