RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
![]() | Home > General > supercharged or HSE which is better |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
abashir Member Since: 12 Jan 2010 Location: london Posts: 13 ![]() ![]() |
Hi there
|
||
![]() |
|
abashir Member Since: 12 Jan 2010 Location: london Posts: 13 ![]() ![]() |
forgot to mention teh rrs hse is 2.7 tdv6 and the SC is 4.2 v8 petrol Peace be upon you |
||
![]() |
|
sweetafton Member Since: 05 Dec 2009 Location: Weymouth Posts: 961 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Supercharged all the way. It all depends on what millage you do mate. Oh and welcome to the site. Mind you i drive a supercharged so ......... |
||
![]() |
|
abashir Member Since: 12 Jan 2010 Location: london Posts: 13 ![]() ![]() |
thanks
|
||
![]() |
|
V8 andy Member Since: 11 May 2009 Location: east yorkshire Posts: 540 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
go for the TDV8, power & economy,, |
||
![]() |
|
closeshave Member Since: 06 Dec 2006 Location: London/Ilinois Posts: 79 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The clunky clattery one is only worth more to those too tight to buy proper petrol. Truth is if petrol and diesel was 10p a gallon we would all have S/C's as they are great. |
||
![]() |
|
Endjin Member Since: 22 Jun 2007 Location: Aberdeenshire Posts: 2087 ![]() ![]() |
That's a pretty arrogant statement M8 ![]() 2013 Evoque 5 Door Pure Tech SD4 - Orkney Grey with Panoramic Roof (Mrs E's new baby) GONE - RRS - 3.0 TDV6 HSE - Santorini (2010) GONE - RRS - 2.7 TDV6 HSE - Java Black (2007) GONE - Porsche Boxster S - 3.2 - Black ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
x5pea Member Since: 03 May 2007 Location: Lanarkshire Posts: 2097 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i think he was referring to the two cars in question which are similarly priced
|
||
![]() |
|
shmoogle Member Since: 07 Sep 2005 Location: ... and for every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you! Posts: 24350 ![]() ![]() |
The diesels have always kept their values more than the SCs but then that's the same across the market.
|
||
![]() |
|
closeshave Member Since: 06 Dec 2006 Location: London/Ilinois Posts: 79 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think you may have taken my statement a tad too seriously! ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
closeshave Member Since: 06 Dec 2006 Location: London/Ilinois Posts: 79 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Exactly right ![]() The only good reason I can see to buy a diesel if you have a supply of red on hand..who is going to dip a Range Rover..?? ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 ![]() ![]() |
Abashir, do you mean 2.7, 3.0, 3.6, 4.2, 4.4 or 5.0ltr engines beacuse all are available in HSE spec
|
||
![]() |
|
closeshave Member Since: 06 Dec 2006 Location: London/Ilinois Posts: 79 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I filled my tank last week and it was bang on £105. I got 200miles from the that tank ![]() But despite that I personally would still take the S/C every time. I mean you get the extra power, less clatter, no horrid diesel smell, you don't share pumps with vans and end up with diesel all over your shoes. And when I really want to impress the bird in the shell garage I can put super in! (it does impress as long as your card goes through when paying) ![]() But seriously...it’s not like any of them are exactly "cheap" to run is it? I would say buy the car you prefer as long as you can afford it and enjoy it. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
abashir Member Since: 12 Jan 2010 Location: london Posts: 13 ![]() ![]() |
the 2 cars i am looking at are
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
![](../images/layout/footer/disclaimer.gif)