RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Just sold my 2018 RRS 🤔 |
|
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8971 |
I'd suggest a nice L320 TDV8 if you're going back to an older RRS. The best diesel they fitted to the L320. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
|
||
Thu Sep 15 2022 2:57pm |
|
Meiang Member Since: 29 Apr 2011 Location: Perth Posts: 402 |
I would second a L320 TDV8 as long as it was a 2010 model. I drove a new 2009 model when they had the petrol 4.4l and it was a dog of an engine compared to the 4.4l petrol. I knew they were bringing a 5l petrol version out shortly and decided to wait for this. When they did you could not get a 5l petrol with dynamic response (a must have) even though the base diesel could be specified with it - what gives.
|
||
Sat Sep 17 2022 10:21am |
|
Michael997 Member Since: 31 Jan 2006 Location: Worcestershire Posts: 225 |
I am looking as you suggest, but finding a good one isn’t easy Thanks Michael Michael 2013 RRS diesel Autobiography Dynamic |
||
Sat Sep 17 2022 5:42pm |
|
Michael997 Member Since: 31 Jan 2006 Location: Worcestershire Posts: 225 |
Thank you hopefully I will find a good one Michael Michael 2013 RRS diesel Autobiography Dynamic |
||
Sat Sep 17 2022 5:43pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8971 |
How odd. The TDV8 was the same engine in 2009 and 2010 and used the same gearbox. Compared to the 4.4 petrol, the TDV8 had about 25-30bhp less but, of course, much more low down grunt (being a diesel). Not sure why you found the 2009 to be a dog other than you were comparing it to an engine with 30bhp more. Of course, the 2010 will have the updated interior although I don't actually see that as a selling point having had both the original interior and the facelifted one (in my 2012). The later interior looks nicer, I suppose, but is definitely not as well made or well detailed. It feels a bit cheap in places. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders 2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed |
||
Mon Sep 19 2022 9:50pm |
|
Meiang Member Since: 29 Apr 2011 Location: Perth Posts: 402 |
The 4.4l V8 petrol was much smoother than the TDV8 (and a lot more refined) and had a much more linear power delivery - I could not have lived with the TDV8 in the 2009 model. The 2010 TDV8 was a lot more refined than the 2009 that I drove - enough that I could live with it. I have driven the Discovery with the 4.4l petrol V8 for quite a while and over a similar distance it was more economical than the range Rover with the TDV8. The Range Rover with the naturally aspirated V8 (275kW) would have been the pick of the bunch - but no dynamic response. |
||
Tue Sep 20 2022 4:09am |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8971 |
Odd. The 2009 and 2010 were the same engine and drivetrain so there should be no difference between them. The 2010 might have had the electronic dampers (dynamic programme on Terrain Response) which the older one didn't, but both had the Dynamic Response active anti roll bars.
|
||
Tue Sep 20 2022 8:10am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis