Bill Portland wrote:

MrMeg wrote:

RR could turn this problem into a winner by announcing that they will only cover this whilst been serviced at RR history that way the would prob even make money in the longer run with cars 3 years+ old.

I don't think they're allowed to do that, as long as the service is carried out by a reputable business, the service is as good as any.

And it would certainly drive me away form the brand. There's no way on this earth that I would let my local Land Rover dealer anywhere near my car.

Crankshaft failures, rather than camshaft. MY2016 HSE D SDV6 - gone due to fuel dilution problems.

By the age of 50 you have the face you deserve - George Orwell.

MrMeg wrote:

I would say its irrelevant on a recall on the S Korea cars it should be the country we are in as the cars would differ a little. I have googled camshaft failures ref rrs and not loads come up and actually some hits on the older models, its mostly forum hits. But then if you google any car and reliably issues most will give you things to worry about if you let it.

I mean irrelevant with them saying its a known cause, surely if they go that route then it should be covered at there cost due to the recall in s.korea.


We really need numbers of RRS made vs how many claims and why, crazy its putting some buyers off although I guess lot of buyers wouldn't even know about it including me until I bought one haha