hello am guessing that this topic has be cover before. but i cant seem to find any good info.
i went to a main dealer,check both the rr and the rrs. but it is very confusing, to choose
i did not test drive none. as i know they drive great bass on what i read

i like the back end shape of the rrsport. but i like the interior or the rr.
i also prefer the actual phone buttons in the rrsport over the touch screen input in the rr.

so if any one knows of a web page where i can compare the 2 cars in-terms of electronic features ,i would really appreciate it.
or any one who owns both. could tell me which one they prefer.
also i know its a rrs forum and most people would go for the sport.
so plz give me your honest input base on comfort and electronic gadgets features.

Last edited by tattootroy on Fri May 23 2008 1:42pm. Edited 1 time in total

have a look see at this :-

http://www.rrsport.co.uk/forum/topic9068.html

might answer all your questions

thanks for that.

Think you ought to buy my RRS £31,999

Pros and cons of each... but it's all subjective really. Even though we're an RRS forum, you won't find many of us who wouldn't be happy driving a FFRR - let us know which you decide to go for!

Also feel free to check out our sister forum, www.fullfatrr.com  

2009 Outstanding Contribution Award - Joint Runner Up
2009 'Tech-Head Of The Year' Award - Runner Up

Like it here? Then Donate to RRSPORT!!

Remember the RR will be replaced soon. LR are giving £2.5k deposit at the moment on them. 2005 Zambezi TDV6 - Gone but not forgotten
2009 Alaska TDV8 - Gone and much missed.



WINNER - 2009 �Idler Of The Year� Award
Runner Up - 2009 �Just Doing What It�s Designed To Do� Award


DO NOT CLICK HERE!

I wouldn't go for a FFRR, afraid I don't like them. Too big and look like they have an overweight behind.

If the sport didn't exist I'd still be an Audi driver!

But then maybe I'm not on the same wave length as others on the Forum when it comes to the FFRR  Current: I can't say...Oh the Shame!
Gone: 2003 Audi S4 - 340BHP of Fun
Gone: 2005 RRS SE, Silver, Chrome Mirrors, Tinted with a stupid spare wheel!
Gone: Audi A4 2.5 TDi Quattro 180bhp
Gone: BMW 535i
Gone: 1985 Audi Quattro
Gone: Subaru Imprezza Turbo (rubbish)

I agree. Would get the D3 over a RR. 2005 Zambezi TDV6 - Gone but not forgotten
2009 Alaska TDV8 - Gone and much missed.



WINNER - 2009 �Idler Of The Year� Award
Runner Up - 2009 �Just Doing What It�s Designed To Do� Award


DO NOT CLICK HERE!

Would get and STD over an FFRR

 Current: I can't say...Oh the Shame!
Gone: 2003 Audi S4 - 340BHP of Fun
Gone: 2005 RRS SE, Silver, Chrome Mirrors, Tinted with a stupid spare wheel!
Gone: Audi A4 2.5 TDi Quattro 180bhp
Gone: BMW 535i
Gone: 1985 Audi Quattro
Gone: Subaru Imprezza Turbo (rubbish)

I'd choose the RRS over a FFRR, but there's no denying the FFRR is a cut above in terms of spec, comfort etc. If they could merge the two and end up with a FFRRS then it would be the perfect car... and more expensive of course. 

2009 Outstanding Contribution Award - Joint Runner Up
2009 'Tech-Head Of The Year' Award - Runner Up

Like it here? Then Donate to RRSPORT!!

Well I was going to stay out of the mud slinging, but seeing as others haven't here goes.

We run 6 RR's, the Sport whilst a good looking vehicle is not a patch on the FFRR, horses for courses, RRS is an X5 beater - a drivers car. FFRR is in the class of a Bentley, whilst I do like both vehicles, the Sport has a cheap interior and resembles a Ford Mondeo - just look at the switchgear, steering wheel and take it from there.

Whether LR in the long term bring out a RRS on a par with a FFRR in quality terms is debatable - maybe they wish to maintain some disparity between the two.

If you want a sports car that handles well go for the RRS, if you want a spacious, comfortable and luxury vehicle, that smooths out every bump there is only one - get yourself a Vogue.

Me I could, and have afforded either - imho for my lifestyle and what I want and need there is no choice. I couldn't fit 5 gentlemen, guns and dogs in the back of a Sport and go wafting around in comfort in the Cairngorms.

Vogue wrote:

If you want a sports car that handles well go for the RRS.

You don't mean that do you?  

2009 Outstanding Contribution Award - Joint Runner Up
2009 'Tech-Head Of The Year' Award - Runner Up

Like it here? Then Donate to RRSPORT!!

Vogue you are right in some ways. My only reason for not recommending the RR is that it looks dated and is due to be replace soonish. 2005 Zambezi TDV6 - Gone but not forgotten
2009 Alaska TDV8 - Gone and much missed.



WINNER - 2009 �Idler Of The Year� Award
Runner Up - 2009 �Just Doing What It�s Designed To Do� Award


DO NOT CLICK HERE!

shmoogle wrote:

Vogue wrote:

If you want a sports car that handles well go for the RRS.

You don't mean that do you?

I'd have a RR over a RRS, however the RRS suited my budget - imo the RR is a much nicer place to be than the RRS. I'd have a RR now if it wasn't for wifey not liking the look of them from the back