RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > Depreciation Good News |
|
|
l Member Since: 11 Jun 2005 Location: Valencia Posts: 232 |
Just seen an article on www.msncars.co.uk saying that the RRS would only depreciate 40% over 3 years so after 3 years it would be worth 60% of its new value. I can see lots of people trading in their cars within the next 3 years Bring on the V8 RRS TDV6 HSE BUCKINGHAM BLUE BLACK LEATHER INTERIOR RHODIUM TASMOD SILLS PARROT 3000 EVOLUTION WHITE SIDE REPEATERS RRPORT.CO.UK BROLLY & STICKER
|
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 9:01am |
|
abrooker Member Since: 27 Nov 2005 Location: Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong Posts: 39 |
Can't figure anything out in that website. 2005 RRS SC 1st Edition Vesuvius Orange |
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 9:20am |
|
l Member Since: 11 Jun 2005 Location: Valencia Posts: 232 |
Sorry it's uk.msn.com scroll down to cars and the headline isJust in Latest Depreciation data RRS TDV6 HSE BUCKINGHAM BLUE BLACK LEATHER INTERIOR RHODIUM TASMOD SILLS PARROT 3000 EVOLUTION WHITE SIDE REPEATERS RRPORT.CO.UK BROLLY & STICKER
|
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 9:27am |
|
keith Member Since: 04 Aug 2005 Location: Scotland Posts: 43 |
Found it here
|
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 9:34am |
|
abrooker Member Since: 27 Nov 2005 Location: Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong Posts: 39 |
I just read the review on that site. What I don't understand is why everyone's banging on about the poor fuel economy? who cares? no one bangs on about supercar fuel economy so why should they with this? To me it seems lots of people want the RRS but can't afford to fuel it. good. keeps it more exclusive. also, i don't think Land Rover are targetting people who care about having 30 or even 20mpg from their cars. these reviewers are just off they can't afford to run one cos otherwise they'd snap one up in a heartbeat. 2005 RRS SC 1st Edition Vesuvius Orange |
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 9:51am |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 |
Unfortunately poor fuel economy seems to be becoming a "feature" of modern Land Rovers as they become heavier and heavier, although I am averaging 26-27mpg in the Tdv6 in day to day driving whereas my TD6 RR was getting 23-24mpg in the same conditions. However on a l;ong trip the TD6 was markedly more economical, regularly returning 32mpg whereas the best I have managed so far in the Sport on a run from Stirtling to Southampton has been 29mpg. Maybe as the Sport get a few more miles on it things will improve, it only has 5500 miles so far. 2020 Pangea Green 1st Edition D240 New Defender 110 is here and loving it
|
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 9:57am |
|
abrooker Member Since: 27 Nov 2005 Location: Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong Posts: 39 |
i'd say anything over 20mpg in a 4x4 is pretty good going. 2005 RRS SC 1st Edition Vesuvius Orange |
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 10:06am |
|
RRUK Member Since: 10 Jun 2005 Location: Leicestershire Posts: 2581 |
People who have bought the Supercharged have done so because of the fun factor in driving it, not the fuel economy. I wouldn't expect the SC to be frugal on the juice, however I would expect the diesel to be acceptable, and I think if you can only get 21mpg as some of you are, then it's not acceptable enough.
|
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 10:28am |
|
MDP Member Since: 14 Jun 2005 Location: Back in an AUDI Posts: 8598 |
Same here - it would have to be such a large improvement in mpg to make me swap from the Supercharged " WITH MORE EXTRAS THAN A HOLLYWOOD EPIC " |
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 10:59am |
|
shmoogle Member Since: 07 Sep 2005 Location: ... and for every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you! Posts: 24350 |
I'd agree, especially in the petrols. Some of the diesel mpg's we're seeing is a bit disappointing, if not entirely unsurprising. I'm getting 24/25mpg out of mine in day-to-day driving and that suits me... I think a lot of folks are incorrectly comparing economies between 4x4s and saloon-type cars with similar engine size. 2009 Outstanding Contribution Award - Joint Runner Up 2009 'Tech-Head Of The Year' Award - Runner Up Like it here? Then Donate to RRSPORT!! |
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 12:51pm |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 |
I've managed to get mine over the 32.4mpg (32.9 on the trip comp) hump after a fill up and gentle run home, but I had to upshift as soon as the command shift would let me in manual/ sport mode to get that.......................
|
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 1:52pm |
|
Biggles Member Since: 26 May 2005 Location: Preston, Posts: 916 |
22.8 on the way into work never seems to better that,
|
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 2:06pm |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 |
Oh yes it can! If the revs are above about 1700rpm in 5th and you are selecting the gears manually rather than in Sport auto mode. It will not allow you to manually up or down shift if the shift will send the revs through the roof or drop them out of the lower reaches of the rev band.
|
||
Thu Dec 08 2005 2:19pm |
|
GMH Member Since: 01 Dec 2005 Location: Herts Posts: 7 |
If the RRS gets the V8 diesel engine, then residuals on the V6 will take a hit. You're only got to read how many of you will want to upgrade to the V8 to know that the V6 model will be in over suppy.
|
||
Tue Dec 13 2005 10:57am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis