RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
![]() | Home > General (L494) > Wading depth |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
scarey Member Since: 07 Jan 2011 Location: in the cloud Posts: 410 ![]() |
in the great scheme of things 5cm isnt that much difference ..factor in the bow wave and you get my drift. |
||
![]() |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 9016 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's probably something like the height of the gearbox and transfer box breathers. They'll be slightly lower in the RRS simple because the vehicle isn't quite as tall at the back of the engine bay - the FFRR and D5 are a bit higher in the bonnet so giving more height for breathers to be placed higher up.
|
||
![]() |
|
1richard1 Member Since: 10 Sep 2019 Location: oldbury Posts: 178 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Or fit a snornkel then you would really have to be in over your head to get a problem. |
||
![]() |
|
jimbg Member Since: 29 Jan 2013 Location: By the River Dart Posts: 1853 ![]() ![]() |
Interesting video on the Discovery's air intake system
|
||
![]() |
|
Punkawallah Member Since: 04 Sep 2018 Location: Salisbury Posts: 159 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That is genuinely interesting! |
||
![]() |
|
riverblanche Member Since: 11 Jun 2011 Location: Retford'ish Posts: 1134 ![]() ![]() |
Hi,
|
||
![]() |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 9016 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interesting. I note that the intake in the wing isn't actually sealed. He says "this seals it" but if you look the bonnet gap is unsealed above the entry in to the wing so water could just go straight it. I guess that's why they have a water trap later in the intake route too. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders 2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed |
||
![]() |
|
naks Member Since: 15 Jul 2016 Location: Stellenbosch Posts: 1176 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
the issue is not waterproofing, you could probably wade in 1m and still be fine.
|
||
![]() |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 9016 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Floating has always been a problem. I remember chatting to the guys at LRE Eastnor before the L405 FFRR was launched. The engineers had been trying to get as much wading depth as possible but it kept floating. I guess that's one reason there is a 900mm limit - much more and you turn in to a boat skipper, not a car driver! |
||
![]() |
|
flydive Member Since: 16 May 2007 Location: South Posts: 1213 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would hate to "find" an open man hole cover while walking the flooded area ![]() I converted my diesel RRS to run on an environmentally friendly mixture of caribou fat and baby seals oil |
||
![]() |
|
ecs0set Member Since: 29 Apr 2021 Location: Poole Posts: 34 ![]() ![]() |
I drove my D4 through a river crossing that was deeper than expected and can confirm floating is the main issue! It automatically engaged extended mode and we quickly hit a slightly shallower section just 60cm downstream but it was scary af and I would never go wading beyond the top of the alloy again. |
||
![]() |
|
peterjj Member Since: 15 Mar 2017 Location: Canberra Posts: 49 ![]() ![]() |
More than just a manhole cover can be missing under floodwater. This low level crossing looked passable because the water seemed only a bit higher than the road level. Or so I heard. (not me in the picture)
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
![](../images/layout/footer/disclaimer.gif)