RRSPORT.CO.UK

    Forum   Gallery   Shop   Sponsors
Home > General > Top Gear 27/11/05
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
 
Very Annoyed
Site Moderator


Member Since: 23 Aug 2005
Location: bat-wielding monkey-spanking tough-love zero-tolerance Euro-sceptic moderator - So just watch it!
Posts: 19459

United Kingdom 
Top Gear 27/11/05

Hats off to Ladyboy for denting the Suzuki Laughing Like every politician he skirted around the questions. Why don't we have time limits of speed cameras? I agree with them outside schools and an introduction of a 20mph there but answer me this - what's more dangerous doing 20mph outside a school at 8.00am or 80mph on a 50mph limit at 2.00am in good conditions? 2005 Zambezi TDV6 - Gone but not forgotten
2009 Alaska TDV8 - Gone and much missed.



WINNER - 2009 �Idler Of The Year� Award
Runner Up - 2009 �Just Doing What It�s Designed To Do� Award


DO NOT CLICK HERE!

Post #6099 Mon Nov 28 2005 1:34pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
shmoogle



Member Since: 07 Sep 2005
Location: ... and for every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you!
Posts: 24350

United Kingdom 

Not that I'm in anyway pro-speed camera (I think the government really needs to think hard about why they are there and how they actually improve matters) but the answer you'll always get is that the law operates 24hrs a day. At the end of the day, if you are travelling along a motorway at 80mph then you're above the legal limit for that road.... unfortunately, that's a difficult argument to win. Times like that you need really to be stopped by a traffic cop with a sympathetic ear - not be recorded in a computer system by a camera. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for travelling at at speeds suitable for the road conditions and you won't find me travelling below 70 on a motorway when I've got a clear road ahead, it's just very difficult to argue with the law. My 6 points tells me that! Embarassed

What's difficult here is for the state to use things like time of day, amount of traffic, weather conditions, quality of road surface and apply all those factors when one of their cameras shows someone travelling past at an illegal speed. As much as I agree with what you're saying, VA, I don't think any govt or body of people given that sort of responsibility would find it feasible - where do you draw your lines?

Maybe we should all just go and live on the Isle of Man... no cameras there to worry us! Wink 

2009 Outstanding Contribution Award - Joint Runner Up
2009 'Tech-Head Of The Year' Award - Runner Up


Like it here? Then Donate to RRSPORT!!

Post #6102 Mon Nov 28 2005 1:59pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Very Annoyed
Site Moderator


Member Since: 23 Aug 2005
Location: bat-wielding monkey-spanking tough-love zero-tolerance Euro-sceptic moderator - So just watch it!
Posts: 19459

United Kingdom 

snmoogle - I take your points and I know that variable speed limits on all roads is impossible, but I think an increase in speed limits on motorways and major A roads should be considered. Remember the M25 has a variable speed limit and it's a system I applaud. I think my main problem is that there are too many speed cameras and not enough patrol cars - the number of bad drivers out there seems to be on the increase and unless the police stop them in person I don't think the situation will improve. Driving dangerously is not just the preserve of speeding drivers. 2005 Zambezi TDV6 - Gone but not forgotten
2009 Alaska TDV8 - Gone and much missed.



WINNER - 2009 �Idler Of The Year� Award
Runner Up - 2009 �Just Doing What It�s Designed To Do� Award


DO NOT CLICK HERE!

Post #6104 Mon Nov 28 2005 2:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Rob_J



Member Since: 02 Nov 2005
Location: Usually flat out on the sofa with glass of vino
Posts: 218

England 2005 Range Rover Sport TDV6 HSE Java Black

In an ideal world I'd say do away with all speed limits, and simply use the offence of dangerous driving. After all couldn't driving at under the speed limit in inappropriate conditions be construed as dangerous driving Eg; 65mph in heavy fog on a motorway. Unfortunately there would always be the idiots out there that would abuse that & the government would never put enough traffic cops out there to police it.

However it will never happen Crying or Very sad We do need more traffic police with common sense than spped cameras. There are far too many variables that need to be applied. What is safe in the GT3 would be very dangerous in a RRS & vice versa. Motorway speeds should be far higher, most traffic seems to travel around 85 anyhow. HSE TD6 (Java Black/Ivory)
911GT3 (Guards Red, carbon interior)
ElanSE (BRG)
Panamera Turbo S
Boxster S

Post #6109 Mon Nov 28 2005 2:28pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
shmoogle



Member Since: 07 Sep 2005
Location: ... and for every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you!
Posts: 24350

United Kingdom 

Very annoyed wrote:
...I think an increase in speed limits on motorways and major A roads should be considered. Remember the M25 has a variable speed limit and it's a system I applaud.

I'd agree with that. You could argue that whatever speed limit was set, a large majority of people would still break it. Look at an average stretch of motorway today and see how many cars are actually within the 70mph limit? Very few. I myself, normally cruise at around 85mph. I don't think I would drive any faster if I knew that the limit was 80mph instead of 70. I think that increasing the speed limit would decrease the amount of speeding fines and endorsements, lessen the amount of associated paperwork and allow the police to focus on those chancers who think it's usual to be blasting along the motorway at excessive speeds. You never know, it might also earn the government some badly needed brownie points.

Very annoyed wrote:
I think my main problem is that there are too many speed cameras and not enough patrol cars - the number of bad drivers out there seems to be on the increase and unless the police stop them in person I don't think the situation will improve. Driving dangerously is not just the preserve of speeding drivers.

Agreed. One of my brothers is a traffic cop and this is his thought exactly. The number of actively policing traffic cops is much less now on the open road - they tend to have a different remit these days. Much less observation and direct enforcement, more involvement in chasing bank robbers in high speed pursuits through town centres. He says a lot of the drivers in his division are morally split between what they believe the traffic cop should be doing and what the chief constable says they will be doing. Unfortunately, policing seems to have become a very political process now. 

2009 Outstanding Contribution Award - Joint Runner Up
2009 'Tech-Head Of The Year' Award - Runner Up


Like it here? Then Donate to RRSPORT!!

Post #6111 Mon Nov 28 2005 2:29pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MDP



Member Since: 14 Jun 2005
Location: Back in an AUDI
Posts: 8598

United Kingdom 

But they rate very highly at filling in forms 
" WITH MORE EXTRAS THAN A HOLLYWOOD EPIC "

Post #6112 Mon Nov 28 2005 2:32pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
RRSPORT.CO.UK RSS Feed - All Forums

Switch to Mobile site