RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General (L494) > Dynamic mode - what does it actually do? |
|
|
midsman Member Since: 24 Dec 2013 Location: West Midlands Posts: 63 |
I am sure that you will receive plenty of technical replies covering the subject. I think that it is one of life's mysteries because I cannot find anything specific in LR literature quantifying what happens when you switch to Dynamic mode. It purports to stiffen up the shock absorbers thus giving a firmer ride, but does not state by how much, It does however turn the instrument panel red so you think that something sporty has happened. To be honest I just stick our car in Auto all Terrain mode and we have no problems. But then again we do not practice drifting around corners and driving on the edge. Perhaps you need a race track to gain the maximum benefit from Dynamic mode. 2015 Range Rover Sport Autobiography Dynamic SDV6
|
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 1:44pm |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 |
Dynamic response changes the "map" of the steering and suspension systems to make the car feel more sporty. It won't be noticeable on a motorway as it is meant for sweeping bends and twisty roads that can be taken at high speed. The additional weighting of the steering and the firming up of the suspension are the most noticeable effects but the way it reduces the body roll is impressive on twisty roads. The difference between Dynamic mode and using S in the gear box is that S changes the shift pattern making the car hold onto revs right up to the point where if you haven't pulled a paddle to shift up then it will do it for you, Dynamic mode has no effect on the gearbox/ shift pattern. If you use your L494 Dynamic off-road the Dynamic system also dislocates the rear anti rolll bar automatically to improve articulation if needs be to extend a wheel down some 10cm extra until it finds something to grip on. The amount of suspension stiffening is variable and adjusted at something like 300 times a minute or more depending on the road surface.
|
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 2:15pm |
|
hafman Member Since: 16 Oct 2016 Location: West Sussex Posts: 92 |
Thanks for your replies; we are still new to RRS ownership. On a recent skiing trip the passengers (and to be honest me also) found the twisty roads on the higher altitude bits (~7,000+ feet) quite uncomfortable. Dry roads, no snow. That could have been exacerbated by the effects of altitude (we had climbed up to that height from low down quite quickly), or perhaps my driving skills . Maybe in hindsight I should have used Dynamic mode, and I will try to use it more often. |
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 2:53pm |
|
JSR2014 Member Since: 10 Feb 2015 Location: Kent Posts: 341 |
One other point re Dynamic, if you are in Dynamic with the gearbox in S then it will not change up for you, you will bounce off the limiter.... 2014.5 Mariana Black 5.0 Supercharged V8 Autobiography
|
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 4:02pm |
|
mikef Member Since: 16 Sep 2013 Location: bucks Posts: 313 |
Is that actually correct? I have a standard 2014 HSE without the Dynamic package but my car still has something called Adaptive Dynamics which as I understand it is a form of variable damper control to maintain body control during cornering. I may be wrong but I thought the Dynamic package was basically a sportier version of Adaptive Dynamics. When I bought my HSE, I test drove the standard HSE and the HSE Dynamic and I couldn't sense much of a difference during cornering, at least not enough to justify paying several thousand quid more for the Dynamic version. The RRS or indeed any L-R is never going to be a sports car and if you're driving the RRS at such a speed that the Dynamic package is the difference between going off the road and not, you're probably driving too fast anyway Having said that I'm due to chop in my HSE this year and I have arranged to test the HSE Dynamic again but over an extended period so maybe I'll change my mind |
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 4:13pm |
|
wilf Member Since: 08 Nov 2012 Location: on the naughty step Posts: 939 |
In a Sport with the "dynamic" pack the anti roll system does indeed "stiffen" the anti roll bars to reduce roll, as well as changing the shock absorber characteristics.
|
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 4:37pm |
|
kmpowell Member Since: 23 Oct 2016 Location: UK Posts: 259 |
In dynamic mode, I find the engine holds onto the gear a fraction longer up the rev range before shifting up/down. Making it more 'sporty' and urgent. SOLD - MY16 SDV6 Autobiography Dynamic - Fire Engine Red, Fixed contrast pan roof, TV, Dual Screen, 5+2, Privacy, Noble paddles. |
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 4:57pm |
|
donny dog Member Since: 23 Nov 2016 Location: yorkshire Posts: 772 |
What effect does dynamic mode have on economy, if any? (Assuming that you're not going mad in dynamic mode, i.e. comparing 'like with like') |
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 5:31pm |
|
udash Member Since: 16 Oct 2009 Location: manchester Posts: 196 |
With Dynamic mode RRS has hydraulically controlled anti roll bars,
|
||||
Mon Jan 09 2017 6:27pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8986 |
Dynamic (the spec level) brings a whole lot of extra kit to the vehicle including two-speed transfer box, torque vectoring by braking / locking rear axle differential, rock crawl, Dynamic Response (hydraulic anti roll bars to give good articulation off road and stiffer bars on road) etc. Active Dynamics is just adjustable rate dampers and is a follow over from the system on original RRS. To be honest, the Dynamic pack (either as HSE Dynamic or as an HSE with the on/off road pack specified) makes the RRS a proper Land Rover. It gives it the full capabilities. Standard HSE lacks the off road kit and is really just a bigger, nicer riding, Evoque. Ironically, the Dynamic is also the better road vehicle too because of the other bits. My guess is that marketing got involved and wanted everything to include "dynamic" in the name... It's a very confusing set of names and really just makes the whole thing confusing for the customer. My view is that this is deliberate. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders 2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed |
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 6:46pm |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 |
On a normal test drive I suspect you would never get to experience the difference between Dynamic cars and non-Dynamic. Maybe on an LRE day out. There are other bits of kit such as the rear e-diff on the Dynamic cars that the non-Dynamic hasn't got and is an expensive option to spec on non-Dynamics. It isn't much help on the road but on 22" road tyres off-road it makes a world of difference in helping to keep you inching forward, off road it seems to work a lot all the time! I think the non-Dynamic also relies more on it's torque vectoring for fast/ twisty cornering which doesn't help disk/ pad life.
|
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 6:46pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8986 |
Difference between HSE and HSE Dynamic in the "transmission and driving dynamics" department.
HSE Dynamic 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders 2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed |
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 6:52pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8986 |
You don't get torque vectoring on non-Dynamic unless you spend £3.5k on the on/off road pack. Then you get a Dynamic by any other name.
You may be right, Tim. It seems a bit more of the watering down of the brand to me. Why bother with all of the kit on FFRR when they are also mostly cruisers these days? Likewise the rest of the stable. Maybe LR should do "town" and "country" versions...or "motorway" and "byway" versions, perhaps I though LR's products were cool and desirable exactly because they're capable of going anywhere. Now it seems that just the badge is enough. Much like BMW and "the ultimate driving machine" I guess. I'm feeling a bit sad now. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders 2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed |
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 6:59pm |
|
wilf Member Since: 08 Nov 2012 Location: on the naughty step Posts: 939 |
When I decided not to buy the "new" XF (as it doesn't have anything like the same "feel" as the X250 facelift version) I tried a RRS twice and just didn't like the way it drove. The XF was such a sweet handling car I was spoiled.
|
||
Mon Jan 09 2017 7:57pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis