RRSPORT.CO.UK

    Forum   Gallery   Shop   Sponsors
Home > General (L494) > 2.0 ingenium engine for RRS MY18
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 2 <12
 
Meiang



Member Since: 29 Apr 2011
Location: Perth
Posts: 403

Australia 2010 Range Rover Sport TDV8 HSE Santorini Black
RR Model Range

I tested the RRS in late 2009 both in 4.4l V8 Petrol and 3.6 V8 Diesel. I drove the petrol first and remember thinking WOW what a really nice car. I took the diesel next and thought in comparison that it was rough and much less refined. Strike out Diesel. I new the 4.4L petrol was going to be replaced by a 5l V8 for the 2010 model year - OK not long to wait. Horrors RR dropped Dynamic Response on the 5l normally aspirated petrol - you couldn't even order it as an option even though the mostly lowly V6 diesel could have it specified. Ever since RR has not made Dynamic Reponse available and any pertol model apart from the supercharged V8.

Move on 12 months - I went to trade my 2001 V8 Discovery 2 on a new 5l V8 Discovery 4 - I didn't consider the 5l RRS as it was slower than the Discovery 5L and didn't have the same levels of equipment and no Dynamic Response.

Sorry Sir there are none available at the moment and it is around a 6 month waiting time to order one and we can't give you a trade in price. We are now talking 2011 model year and RR don't even offer a V8 diesel version of the Sport so buying a RRS was not even an option as I didn't want the spend the amount required to buy the Supercharged V8. Just as I was about to walk out they said we have a new 2010 highly specified TDV8 or a low specification supercharged V8 at discounted prices - we need to move them. To end the long story I bought the TDV8 - In hindsight I should have paid the extra $20K and bought the supercharged V8.

After 5 years of diesel ownership would I by other diesel - no. They are not as refined as very good petrol engine, the power delivery is not as progressive and relaxing (I have driven a 5l Discovery at length compared to my TDV8 - no comparison the petrol wins all the time), the total life cost is significantly higher, they are not significantly more economical on fuel compared to a petrol (13l/100km TDV8 vs 14l/100m 5l V8 Discovery) and diesel here is 20% more expensive than petrol.

Both LR and RR are no longer interested in selling petrol engined cars (except in the US). With the diesel problems of DPF's, Urea Injection, blocked EGR systems, clogged inlet manifold systems etc - It is not an engine of choice. In fact I couldn't buy a 2016 diesel as I don't ever drive fast enough or long enough to allow DPF regeneration to occur and having to take out the car just to regenerate the DPF is crazy mans talk.

Post #503197 Fri Aug 19 2016 5:50am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JSR2014



Member Since: 10 Feb 2015
Location: Kent
Posts: 341

England 2013 Range Rover Sport Supercharged Santorini Black

Quote:
Both LR and RR are no longer interested in selling petrol engined cars (except in the US)


So, the SVR is something that LR and RR are not interested in? The fact they've just introduced a third petrol engine into the range in the UK also means they are not interested?

Oh - and they aren't interested in the 5.0V8 Petrol (such as mine)? With more and more countries discouraging Diesel engines I believe that LR are actually ahead of the curve on this.

It appears, wrongly or rightly, that you have real issues with LR, however I suggest that you make sure you are in possession of all the facts before making sweeping statements.

Perhaps you should just buy something else and move on. Either way, I am sick of your continuous whinging and moaning. 2014.5 Mariana Black 5.0 Supercharged V8 Autobiography

Post #503222 Fri Aug 19 2016 1:34pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Meiang



Member Since: 29 Apr 2011
Location: Perth
Posts: 403

Australia 2010 Range Rover Sport TDV8 HSE Santorini Black
Do We Live in A Cold War Eatern Block Environment

Thankyou for you observations.

I didn't think we lived in a Cold War Eastern Block world anymore. I stand corrected.

Post #503224 Fri Aug 19 2016 1:47pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Stecla



Member Since: 20 Jun 2015
Location: Newbury
Posts: 157

England 2010 Range Rover Sport TDV8 HSE Stornoway Grey

I may very well be wrong, but don't car manufacturers get classed/charged by co2 emissions across the range? In which case, this may be the reason for the car (assuming it did actually come to fruition). Win win for them. Sell some 2.0 rrs to the school run mob, lower brand emissions and potentially get them on the list for some company cars.

To be fair the xc90 is a 2 litre and is seemingly ok. Not saying it's right, but it is the way many companies are going. Thing is, the roads round my way are alrady flooded with new rrs. Bring a 2 litre out, and just about everyone will have one. 2010 TDV8

Post #503238 Fri Aug 19 2016 4:26pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
wilf



Member Since: 08 Nov 2012
Location: on the naughty step
Posts: 939

You could very well be right.

Average fuel consumption is a big problem for JLR. MY2016 HSE D SDV6 - gone due to fuel dilution problems.

By the age of 50 you have the face you deserve - George Orwell.

Post #503247 Fri Aug 19 2016 7:56pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
DrFox1969



Member Since: 02 Feb 2016
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 190

Australia 
Re: RR Model Range

Meiang wrote:
I tested the RRS in late 2009 both in 4.4l V8 Petrol and 3.6 V8 Diesel. I drove the petrol first and remember thinking WOW what a really nice car. I took the diesel next and thought in comparison that it was rough and much less refined. Strike out Diesel. I new the 4.4L petrol was going to be replaced by a 5l V8 for the 2010 model year - OK not long to wait. Horrors RR dropped Dynamic Response on the 5l normally aspirated petrol - you couldn't even order it as an option even though the mostly lowly V6 diesel could have it specified. Ever since RR has not made Dynamic Reponse available and any pertol model apart from the supercharged V8.

Move on 12 months - I went to trade my 2001 V8 Discovery 2 on a new 5l V8 Discovery 4 - I didn't consider the 5l RRS as it was slower than the Discovery 5L and didn't have the same levels of equipment and no Dynamic Response.

Sorry Sir there are none available at the moment and it is around a 6 month waiting time to order one and we can't give you a trade in price. We are now talking 2011 model year and RR don't even offer a V8 diesel version of the Sport so buying a RRS was not even an option as I didn't want the spend the amount required to buy the Supercharged V8. Just as I was about to walk out they said we have a new 2010 highly specified TDV8 or a low specification supercharged V8 at discounted prices - we need to move them. To end the long story I bought the TDV8 - In hindsight I should have paid the extra $20K and bought the supercharged V8.

After 5 years of diesel ownership would I by other diesel - no. They are not as refined as very good petrol engine, the power delivery is not as progressive and relaxing (I have driven a 5l Discovery at length compared to my TDV8 - no comparison the petrol wins all the time), the total life cost is significantly higher, they are not significantly more economical on fuel compared to a petrol (13l/100km TDV8 vs 14l/100m 5l V8 Discovery) and diesel here is 20% more expensive than petrol.

Both LR and RR are no longer interested in selling petrol engined cars (except in the US). With the diesel problems of DPF's, Urea Injection, blocked EGR systems, clogged inlet manifold systems etc - It is not an engine of choice. In fact I couldn't buy a 2016 diesel as I don't ever drive fast enough or long enough to allow DPF regeneration to occur and having to take out the car just to regenerate the DPF is crazy mans talk.


Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but I just though I would point out a few issues with your post.

The RRS is a completely different vehicle to a Disco. You are also using your 5 year old TDV8 as a benchmark. Many current L494 owners will point out the obvious flaws in that.

You make comparisons between diesels and petrol's using your 5 year old benchmark. For comparison the table below uses figures from the current L494 using Land Rover Australia website.


Engine Power (KW) Torque (Nm) 0 – 100 KPH (s) Fuel Economy (l/100km) Drive Away Price ($AUD)

V6SC 250 450 7.2 Urban 14.9 / Comb 10.8 $142,780 (HSE)


V8SC 375 625 5.3 Urban 20.5 / Comb 13.7 $185,521(HSE Dynamic)


SDV6 225 700 7.2 Urban 7.9 / Comb 7.0 $144,744(HSE)


SDV8 250 740 6.9 Urban 11.5 / Comb 8.6 $160,911(HSE)


Clearly the comparison between an SDV6 and a V6SC shows the vehicles very close on stats, apart from fuel economy where the the SDV6 wins by a country mile. The no brainer in this comparison is the SDV6 as it also has better towing capacity and I would say better residuals.

As a comparison between the SDV8 and the V8SC, clearly the V8SC wins on performance but then is thrashed on fuel economy and price. The SCV8 is $25k dearer even in basic spec and uses 44% more fuel on the urban cycle. Not sure where you get your comparison figures from but clearly they don't reflect current vehicle stats.

At current fuel prices (using Fuelwatch.com.au in Perth) and noting V8SC uses Premium 95RON unleaded, the price difference is not significant ($1.13/l for PULP and $1.19/l for diesel) and not the 20% difference you quote.

Clearly you prefer the V8 over the diesels however the stats you quote are incorrect and don't reflect the true facts. Today's common rail diesels are much smoother than previous, have better power delivery due to the masses of torque compared to the petrol versions. The V8SC is a fantastic engine, however has much higher purchase costs and much greater fuel consumption than the diesels.

I have read a number of your posts now and you seem to have a real problem with the RRS. You make comparisons with your own LR products but it seems as though this is a 5 year old RRS and not even a current L494.

I suppose your option is to not buy another LR product, but to just come on here to complain about how bad the LR products are will only get you the type of responses you have been getting. 2016 Range Rover Sport SDV8 HSE Dynamic (Indus Silver/Santorini Black Pano Roof, Ebony/Cirrus leather, custom grey Style 508 alloys)

Post #503395 Mon Aug 22 2016 3:06am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
rangiejools



Member Since: 11 May 2008
Location: Mornington Peninsula Vic
Posts: 187

Australia 

I know 5 other RRS L494 owners all who have come from X5s, Q7s etc. All of them say that the RRS is the best car they have ever owned. I would agree with that. RRS P460e
1983 2 door Range Rover ARB Bar X9000 winch ARB Rear Bar now semi retired.
Many big trips done in this one.
1982 Rangerover nearly restored.
22 Defender D250 with lots of stuff for outback touring
Nice 2013 Freelander TD4 manual (for daughter to learn on) with much better stereo compared with previous SD4 SE with Meridian which sounded bad!
2013 Land Rover Defender ute.

Post #503655 Thu Aug 25 2016 3:01am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ali5711



Member Since: 04 Jan 2016
Location: notts
Posts: 36

United Kingdom 

The L494 is a great design compared to the competition, if you suffer any issues with it and LR's frustrating attitude at times can change the overall opinion of the RRS.

Post #503660 Thu Aug 25 2016 7:05am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Slim444



Member Since: 09 Nov 2015
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 200

United Kingdom 2011 Range Rover Sport 3.0 TDV6 HSE Stornoway Grey

I had a Jaguar XF with the 4-pot 2.0 diesel in it when my RRS was in for warranty work, and it was bloody awful, really spoilt the whole image! Really agricultural sounding, and a bone shaker, especially when idling. Acceleration was pretty good, but not the sort of clatter you'd expect in such marques...

Post #503676 Thu Aug 25 2016 11:41am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
sally



Member Since: 01 Sep 2014
Location: out and about
Posts: 376

United Kingdom 

My dealer joked yesterday that the 0-60 on this new model is recorded on a calendar not a stop watch! 2012 Evoque
2014 Sport Autobiography
2015 SVR for the fun stuff
2016 Evoque SI4 Dynamic Lux for the daily drive
2016 Defender 90
2018 SVR

Post #503745 Fri Aug 26 2016 8:41am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
wilf



Member Since: 08 Nov 2012
Location: on the naughty step
Posts: 939

The 170BHP Ingenium diesel engine is not exactly "up there" in terms of NVH vs the competition, wonder what the 240BHP version will be like?

And when will we see the Ingenium petrols? MY2016 HSE D SDV6 - gone due to fuel dilution problems.

By the age of 50 you have the face you deserve - George Orwell.

Post #503746 Fri Aug 26 2016 8:49am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 2 <12
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
RRSPORT.CO.UK RSS Feed - All Forums

Switch to Mobile site