RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General (L494) > 2.0 ingenium engine for RRS MY18 |
|
|
JSR2014 Member Since: 10 Feb 2015 Location: Kent Posts: 341 |
So, the SVR is something that LR and RR are not interested in? The fact they've just introduced a third petrol engine into the range in the UK also means they are not interested? Oh - and they aren't interested in the 5.0V8 Petrol (such as mine)? With more and more countries discouraging Diesel engines I believe that LR are actually ahead of the curve on this. It appears, wrongly or rightly, that you have real issues with LR, however I suggest that you make sure you are in possession of all the facts before making sweeping statements. Perhaps you should just buy something else and move on. Either way, I am sick of your continuous whinging and moaning. 2014.5 Mariana Black 5.0 Supercharged V8 Autobiography |
||
Fri Aug 19 2016 1:34pm |
|
Meiang Member Since: 29 Apr 2011 Location: Perth Posts: 403 |
Thankyou for you observations.
|
||
Fri Aug 19 2016 1:47pm |
|
Stecla Member Since: 20 Jun 2015 Location: Newbury Posts: 157 |
I may very well be wrong, but don't car manufacturers get classed/charged by co2 emissions across the range? In which case, this may be the reason for the car (assuming it did actually come to fruition). Win win for them. Sell some 2.0 rrs to the school run mob, lower brand emissions and potentially get them on the list for some company cars.
|
||
Fri Aug 19 2016 4:26pm |
|
wilf Member Since: 08 Nov 2012 Location: on the naughty step Posts: 939 |
You could very well be right.
|
||
Fri Aug 19 2016 7:56pm |
|
DrFox1969 Member Since: 02 Feb 2016 Location: Adelaide Posts: 190 |
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but I just though I would point out a few issues with your post. The RRS is a completely different vehicle to a Disco. You are also using your 5 year old TDV8 as a benchmark. Many current L494 owners will point out the obvious flaws in that. You make comparisons between diesels and petrol's using your 5 year old benchmark. For comparison the table below uses figures from the current L494 using Land Rover Australia website. Engine Power (KW) Torque (Nm) 0 – 100 KPH (s) Fuel Economy (l/100km) Drive Away Price ($AUD) V6SC 250 450 7.2 Urban 14.9 / Comb 10.8 $142,780 (HSE) V8SC 375 625 5.3 Urban 20.5 / Comb 13.7 $185,521(HSE Dynamic) SDV6 225 700 7.2 Urban 7.9 / Comb 7.0 $144,744(HSE) SDV8 250 740 6.9 Urban 11.5 / Comb 8.6 $160,911(HSE) Clearly the comparison between an SDV6 and a V6SC shows the vehicles very close on stats, apart from fuel economy where the the SDV6 wins by a country mile. The no brainer in this comparison is the SDV6 as it also has better towing capacity and I would say better residuals. As a comparison between the SDV8 and the V8SC, clearly the V8SC wins on performance but then is thrashed on fuel economy and price. The SCV8 is $25k dearer even in basic spec and uses 44% more fuel on the urban cycle. Not sure where you get your comparison figures from but clearly they don't reflect current vehicle stats. At current fuel prices (using Fuelwatch.com.au in Perth) and noting V8SC uses Premium 95RON unleaded, the price difference is not significant ($1.13/l for PULP and $1.19/l for diesel) and not the 20% difference you quote. Clearly you prefer the V8 over the diesels however the stats you quote are incorrect and don't reflect the true facts. Today's common rail diesels are much smoother than previous, have better power delivery due to the masses of torque compared to the petrol versions. The V8SC is a fantastic engine, however has much higher purchase costs and much greater fuel consumption than the diesels. I have read a number of your posts now and you seem to have a real problem with the RRS. You make comparisons with your own LR products but it seems as though this is a 5 year old RRS and not even a current L494. I suppose your option is to not buy another LR product, but to just come on here to complain about how bad the LR products are will only get you the type of responses you have been getting. 2016 Range Rover Sport SDV8 HSE Dynamic (Indus Silver/Santorini Black Pano Roof, Ebony/Cirrus leather, custom grey Style 508 alloys) |
||
Mon Aug 22 2016 3:06am |
|
rangiejools Member Since: 11 May 2008 Location: Mornington Peninsula Vic Posts: 187 |
I know 5 other RRS L494 owners all who have come from X5s, Q7s etc. All of them say that the RRS is the best car they have ever owned. I would agree with that. RRS P460e
|
||
Thu Aug 25 2016 3:01am |
|
ali5711 Member Since: 04 Jan 2016 Location: notts Posts: 36 |
The L494 is a great design compared to the competition, if you suffer any issues with it and LR's frustrating attitude at times can change the overall opinion of the RRS. |
||
Thu Aug 25 2016 7:05am |
|
Slim444 Member Since: 09 Nov 2015 Location: Huntingdon Posts: 200 |
I had a Jaguar XF with the 4-pot 2.0 diesel in it when my RRS was in for warranty work, and it was bloody awful, really spoilt the whole image! Really agricultural sounding, and a bone shaker, especially when idling. Acceleration was pretty good, but not the sort of clatter you'd expect in such marques... |
||
Thu Aug 25 2016 11:41am |
|
sally Member Since: 01 Sep 2014 Location: out and about Posts: 376 |
My dealer joked yesterday that the 0-60 on this new model is recorded on a calendar not a stop watch! 2012 Evoque
|
||
Fri Aug 26 2016 8:41am |
|
wilf Member Since: 08 Nov 2012 Location: on the naughty step Posts: 939 |
The 170BHP Ingenium diesel engine is not exactly "up there" in terms of NVH vs the competition, wonder what the 240BHP version will be like?
|
||
Fri Aug 26 2016 8:49am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis