RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
![]() | Home > General (L494) > Range Rover Sport SVR vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo track battle |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
Mark_N Member Since: 09 Aug 2013 Location: London Posts: 1102 ![]() ![]() |
Well, yes, the sound of the SVR in full flight is a wondrous thing. Mark
|
||
![]() |
|
Dave777 Member Since: 15 Feb 2015 Location: Sussex Posts: 485 ![]() ![]() |
Might have been a TT RS+
|
||
![]() |
|
Cobnapint Member Since: 02 May 2015 Location: LEICESTER Posts: 2 ![]() ![]() |
I think some of you on here are dancing around the truth on that comparison with the Porsche.
|
||
![]() |
|
drdelrrs Member Since: 02 Nov 2010 Location: UK Posts: 1163 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree in the 'looks' category the RRS wins but I suspect if you did the same test day after day in the Porsche it would keep on going. However I've a sneaky feeling that a few bits on the RRS might just start to complain.
|
||
![]() |
|
Renaco Member Since: 28 Jul 2011 Location: Bavaria Posts: 324 ![]() ![]() |
I love those discussions.
|
||
![]() |
|
362bkr Member Since: 06 Dec 2013 Location: devon Posts: 856 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i would agree but still it would be nice to see them go head to head in the woods |
||
![]() |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 9023 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Porsche is better on track, the RRS better off road. Blah, blah. It's funny as the vast majority will never go off road or on track. What matters is how the thing works for you with your driving requirements - although most people are vacuous enough to think that "badge" and "image" are the most important thing, which is bizarre but that's people for you. |
||
![]() |
|
philmw Member Since: 18 Aug 2006 Location: Nottingham Posts: 1672 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Another thing for sure, in dynamic and sport mode, the SVR's sound makes me laugh each and everything time you accelerate or lift off, even when doing 30 mph. |
||
![]() |
|
Dave777 Member Since: 15 Feb 2015 Location: Sussex Posts: 485 ![]() ![]() |
I would rather have an Aerial Atom for the track. But to get to the track it would be a RRS any day. The noise of the SVR is the icing on the cake (very thick and loud icing too |
||
![]() |
|
Cobnapint Member Since: 02 May 2015 Location: LEICESTER Posts: 2 ![]() ![]() |
And that's the BIG problem in my eyes. I'd love a great big RRS SDV6 to waft around in, but the endless horror stories on here with regard to reliability, even with cars straight out of the dealers showroom, put me right off. On the other hand, my V6 Diesel Cayenne hasn't put a foot wrong in over 3 years of ownership from new. Nothing, nada, zilch. I couldn't bear niggly little annoyances which would mean me getting to know my local RR service dept by their first names. And another thing, RR haven't developed an EU6 V6d yet have they...? I know the ingenium 4's are on the menu, what about the RRS engines...? |
||
![]() |
|
Baco Member Since: 13 Aug 2013 Location: Belgium Posts: 154 ![]() ![]() |
Interesting discussion |
||
![]() |
|
SPX Member Since: 26 Dec 2012 Location: South Yorkshire Posts: 587 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Porsche that's essentially a VW underneath? VW are known for their great reliability though, probably why Porsche have to use their engines. |
||
![]() |
|
alexv Member Since: 02 Mar 2015 Location: beds Posts: 51 ![]() ![]() |
(sadly the Cayenne S Diesel wil be gone, so that's no option [/quote]
|
||
![]() |
|
Baco Member Since: 13 Aug 2013 Location: Belgium Posts: 154 ![]() ![]() |
That's what my dealer said (due to EU6 regulations), so at least in my country these won't be available any more. Porsche urged the dealers to sell the Cayenne S Diesel cars in stock asap too. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d49cf/d49cfc835ffefa2c9e3f1d6b13d1b3797c34c12f" alt=""