RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Off Roading & Green Laning > Wading depth |
|
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 |
Yes - there are no wing intakes anymore on the new FFRR. The "vent" like trim on the doors is an ornament and of no practical use. Like the Evoque the intakes of the L405 are on top of the front wheel arches, under the edge of the clamshell bonnet, nicely protected from sucking in water or sand. This gives the Evoque the same wading depth as my Defender - 500mm and how the L405 can get 900mm with off road height in use - will be even more if you get the car into extended height!
|
||
Tue Sep 11 2012 6:22pm |
|
flydive Member Since: 16 May 2007 Location: South Posts: 1213 |
Pre 2010 RRS have a wading depth of 700mm too. '08 RRS TDV8
|
||
Tue Sep 11 2012 9:09pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 9003 |
Not according to the owner's manual they don't... 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
|
||
Tue Sep 11 2012 10:38pm |
|
flydive Member Since: 16 May 2007 Location: South Posts: 1213 |
There seems to be a bit of confusion on the informations.
|
||
Tue Sep 11 2012 10:42pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 9003 |
Yes, it's odd isn't it?
|
||
Tue Sep 11 2012 10:57pm |
|
garrycol Member Since: 30 Nov 2010 Location: Canberra Posts: 1068 |
The handbook for my 07 2.7 has wading depth of 540mm. I do not understand why the later models would have a higher wading depth as the intakes systems are basically the same with the exception that the pipe that joins the intake to the airbox is waterproof on the later models.
|
||
Wed Sep 12 2012 2:41am |
|
mse Member Since: 08 Mar 2011 Location: Warwickshire Posts: 2916 |
They did used to have a separate off road manual in the UK, ive got one for my discovery - its more an off road guide or techniques thing...certainly all in one now. Mike 2014 Facelift Discovery |
||
Wed Sep 12 2012 9:48am |
|
muddywheels Milk Float Man Member Since: 30 Jun 2010 Location: East Riding of Yorkshire Posts: 5637 |
Now this is wading
|
||
Mon Oct 01 2012 2:42pm |
|
crookedm Member Since: 03 Apr 2012 Location: North West Posts: 296 |
Can't polish one hey! |
||
Mon Oct 01 2012 8:01pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 9003 |
Back to the original question, looking at the LR3 (Disco 3) workshop manual, I think the wading depth is determined by the height of the breather pipes for the gearbox and the differentials.
|
||
Tue Oct 02 2012 9:05pm |
|
mrfrog Member Since: 07 Aug 2012 Location: Berkshire Posts: 285 |
Exactly, this is why breather pipes are fitted.
What about the air intake ? Max wading depth (unless fitted with a snorkel) will be as high as the lowest air intake, breather or engine. You could theoretically wade deeper than the air intake if you can maintain a bow wave and water depression by the air intake, but if you have to stop for any reason, best stop the engine immediately and not restart it "Roads ? Where we're going there are no roads." Back to the future. |
||
Tue Oct 02 2012 9:16pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 9003 |
The air intake is the wing vent and that is much higher than 700mm above the ground in off-road suspension mode. I would expect the air supply path to be air tight (and thus water tight to a reasonable degree). This leaves breathers and electrics as the controlling issue.
|
||
Tue Oct 02 2012 9:29pm |
|
mrfrog Member Since: 07 Aug 2012 Location: Berkshire Posts: 285 |
Another thing to bear in mind is flotation I read yesterday the new FFRR has been deeper than 900mm but started to float off. Might sound silly, but in flowing currents (not raging), a slight amount of flotation can be the difference between setting the course and riding it. I'd be surprised if the RRS floated that easily though, but just one thing to bear in mind when thinking through the reasons for the wading limit being set where it is. "Roads ? Where we're going there are no roads." Back to the future. |
||
Tue Oct 02 2012 9:36pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 9003 |
True enough but the thing that set me off on this question was what had changed between years in the RRS that meant an increase of 160mm in the published wading depth - floating risk isn't it I'm sure.
|
||
Tue Oct 02 2012 10:16pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis