RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Technical > Range Rover 4x4 system comments |
|
|
BoatMad Member Since: 11 Feb 2007 Location: Dublin Posts: 66 |
What.. Theres no difference, Theres LSD, and locking diffs, ( which may be progressive or not) are essentially the same,, ie they achieve the same thing, The RR and RRS centre diff is a multi plate clutch, progressive lock system, The Jeeps with QuadraDrive II is a gearoter with electronic control that allows the lock to be proressive. The Jeeps has this system fitted to all axles, whereas the RR amd RRS have only one centre diff, This then relies on Traction control ( a freebee from ABS) to limit wheel slip, however in heavy going this heats up, causes significant brake wear and fading, unlike a Jeep which can go forever. Given that LR advertise these as the " best 4x4 x far" its actually using a system that more like X5's and other yummy mummy 4x4's. The existence of low range by the way is no indication of a better 4x4. Sure the disco3 has the rear diff as standard , but still relies on TC to limit front wheel slip. LR are saving a few quid thats all. ( and letting markerting convince you otherwise). BTW, My TC quit , I wasnt going quickly , but I was in a deep snow ( around 1 foot) for about two hours, but then the TC shut down, no abs, no traction control, the centre diff continued to do its thing, but its hardly the " best 4x4x far" IN the context of Jeeps. I am only talking about the new QuadraDriveII system, not the older SelectTrak and CommandTrak , which were worse then LR's. I agree that my RRS system as a whole, ie air springs, ride control etc is a better all round package then the Jeep, but the 4x4 system is wanting. RRS HSE TDV8 Java black/Ebony interior, mud flaps,20" stormers, towing, roofrack,sunroof,cooler V8 Tasmods Sills,black badges, carstyling java black vents Previously FFRR TD6 Metallic Grey |
||
Tue Jan 19 2010 1:37pm |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 |
Then you should trade your RRS in for a Jeep as it appears that that is better suited to doing what you need it to do than your RRS.
|
||
Tue Jan 19 2010 2:23pm |
|
disco4x4au Member Since: 17 Nov 2009 Location: Perth Posts: 147 |
No, as said before, the rear eLocker is optional on both the D4 and RRS (unless you spec the D4 as a V8 HSE). With the rear eLocker fitted, the TC doesn't work nearly as hard, and personally I find it a much better set-up than having a front locking diff - no shock-loading, no steering slip and no diff pumpkin hanging down and getting caught up! I've used the system for 4 ~ 5 hours in 42C heat and it hasn't given up yet - although I do stop occasionally to check the car for spinifex caught under the chassis (a fire hazard over here). Cheers, Gordon 2015 RRS SDV6 SE, Santorini Black, GOE 2-way HS rods, Traxide dual battery, 275/55R20 Nitto TerraGraplers 2015 Discovery 4 SDV6 HSE - GOE 3-way HS rods, GOE underbody plates and sliders, 275/65R18 Courgia MT |
||
Wed Jan 20 2010 1:16am |
|
diamond Member Since: 09 Feb 2009 Location: Dusseldorf, Germany Posts: 217 |
I agree with boatmad that a front locking diff is better than none or an ABS driven one. But i cannot understand why TC had problems with snow especially because of the front diff.
|
||
Wed Jan 20 2010 9:10am |
|
lespes Member Since: 16 Jun 2008 Location: Channel Islands Posts: 1052 |
Locking differentials do have some disadvantages. Because they do not operate as smoothly as standard differentials, they are often responsible for increased tire wear. Some locking differentials are known for making a clicking or banging noise when locking and unlocking as the vehicle negotiates turns. This is annoying to many drivers. Also, some locking differentials can affect the ability of a vehicle to steer in some situations, especially when the locker is located in the front axle. They are also capable of subjecting the axle shafts to much higher torque loads than would be possible with an open differential because they allow 100% of the available torque to carried by a single axle shaft as opposed to being divided up between the two. Under extreme conditions, this can cause an axle shaft failure.
|
||
Wed Jan 20 2010 10:23am |
|
diamond Member Since: 09 Feb 2009 Location: Dusseldorf, Germany Posts: 217 |
|
||
Wed Jan 20 2010 9:15pm |
|
Leo Member Since: 17 Sep 2007 Location: Nomad Posts: 554 |
Not really. Anyway, the RRS system is far superior to any Jeep, bar the Wrangler Rubicon. In standard form the RRS will run rings around a standard Grand Cherokee. The rear diff lock is a cheap option, cheaper than after-market lockers that other brands use, and the way it works is much better than a traditional, manual diff-lock. The standard centre diff-lock does not rely on traction control. If you experienced problems in the snow, it was probably down to your tyres. |
||
Wed Jan 20 2010 9:23pm |
|
diamond Member Since: 09 Feb 2009 Location: Dusseldorf, Germany Posts: 217 |
Angel... 2009 Range Rover Sport 2.7 TDV6 SE, Alaska White, Almond leather, tinted windows, active rear diff, tow pack, HiICE, full spare: gone and already missed
|
||
Fri Jan 22 2010 9:49am |
|
BoatMad Member Since: 11 Feb 2007 Location: Dublin Posts: 66 |
Could you justify that. I am only comparing Jeeps top of the rnage system, which is the QuadraTrakII system, which are geroter based with electronic control. DIff on all axles. I'm not arguing that the RR system isnt good, I'm arguing that its not the best. Any TC based system is not as good as a diff based system. RR has a good centre diff ( multiplate progressive lock up), butthe lack of front and rear diffs ( as standard) is a serious ommision and the TC system is used to give a semblance of 4x4 all wheel drive. In realtion to my experience, I cant say why the TC system dropped out, but it did, during a long snow drive ( on a road that I really shouldnt have been on in conditions). But I was left after about 2 hours driving, with no TC or ABS ( or Hill desent) system. not good in my opinion. RRS HSE TDV8 Java black/Ebony interior, mud flaps,20" stormers, towing, roofrack,sunroof,cooler V8 Tasmods Sills,black badges, carstyling java black vents Previously FFRR TD6 Metallic Grey |
||
Mon Jan 25 2010 1:18pm |
|
sportdriver Member Since: 21 Nov 2009 Location: Dorset Posts: 63 |
Well I wouldn't know whether the Jeep or RRS has the best setup as far as diffs etc. goes. What I do know is when I started looking for a 4WD - my criteria was (in this order):
|
||
Mon Jan 25 2010 6:39pm |
|
disco4x4au Member Since: 17 Nov 2009 Location: Perth Posts: 147 |
Having competed in D1's and D3's (in production class 4x4 events) I'd say that with the optional rear eLocker, the D3 is a better off-roader than the Jeep, so I imagine the RRS would be similar. Without the eLocker, the Jeep's system may be better in some situations (rock climbing, steep mud climbs), but worse in others (sand, cross-slopes). I can't comment on snow, don't get much of it over here
|
||
Tue Jan 26 2010 1:52am |
|
ASH555 Member Since: 02 Dec 2006 Location: East Yorkshire Posts: 750 |
MY10 3.0 TDV6 HSE, Zermatt Silver, 20" Diamond Turned Alloys, Factory Privacy Glass, Premium Leather, Contrast Stiching, Side Steps, Etc Gone 2006 '56' 2.7 TDV6 HSE, Zermatt Silver, 20", Side Steps, Brembos, Dynamic Pack, Etc VW Transporter, 19" Rims, T32 170 BHP, Lowered |
||
Tue Jan 26 2010 8:38am |
|
AllyG Member Since: 27 Oct 2013 Location: Isle of Skye Posts: 1 |
Never in my life have I read so much misinformation as contained in the above post! WOW! know what you are talking about or at least check facts before posting on a public forum! |
||
Sun Oct 27 2013 7:03pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis