RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
![]() | Home > General > Bombshell - Cayenne Turbo vs. RRS SC |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
PauloAmore Member Since: 27 Jan 2007 Location: Bonnie Scotland Posts: 1292 ![]() ![]() |
Interesting post. Thanks for sharing.
|
||
![]() |
|
l Member Since: 11 Jun 2005 Location: Valencia Posts: 232 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's difficult to compare cars with the RRS particularly as it's regarded as the best-looking 4x4. Funny enough the same sort of thing happened to me when I compared the X5 3.0D with my RRS. The RRS won hands down in my opinion. I think maybe we expect so much from other motors without realizing that the Sport is an excellent package all round. |
||
![]() |
|
XXXAngelXXX Member Since: 03 Mar 2006 Location: Krautland Posts: 10894 ![]() ![]() |
Don`t mention my hometown Stuttgart all the time |
||
![]() |
|
shmoogle Member Since: 07 Sep 2005 Location: ... and for every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you! Posts: 24350 ![]() ![]() |
Interesting WW |
||
![]() |
|
Rob_J Member Since: 02 Nov 2005 Location: Usually flat out on the sofa with glass of vino Posts: 218 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interesting...similar debate kicked off yesterday on another forum I frequent....much arguing going on between the British & German camps.....as follows .....
|
||
![]() |
|
shmoogle Member Since: 07 Sep 2005 Location: ... and for every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you! Posts: 24350 ![]() ![]() |
Which forum's that Rob? Chap called nomis used to frequent BM3W and had a X5 4.8 if I remember |
||
![]() |
|
Rob_J Member Since: 02 Nov 2005 Location: Usually flat out on the sofa with glass of vino Posts: 218 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's the same chap, it's taken from http://puregt.com/ guy writing the above races M3's and has a couple of other BMW's. HSE TD6 (Java Black/Ivory) 911GT3 (Guards Red, carbon interior) ElanSE (BRG) Panamera Turbo S Boxster S |
||
![]() |
|
shmoogle Member Since: 07 Sep 2005 Location: ... and for every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you! Posts: 24350 ![]() ![]() |
Thanks mate |
||
![]() |
|
tf9 Member Since: 07 Jun 2006 Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 643 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
".stats say that the Cayenne has about 2 secs on my HST, I would challenge that....maybe 0.5 sec or 1 sec tops. Anyway, real world stats win anyday. "
|
||
![]() |
|
Pelyma Member Since: 28 Sep 2005 Location: Sussex Posts: 1497 ![]() ![]() |
Until you get on the sticky stuff |
||
![]() |
|
will_wonka Member Since: 03 Mar 2007 Location: Tminus 12 months for the RS Sport Supercharged!! Posts: 3377 ![]() ![]() |
I don't doubt it, however, the figures you have quoted are manufacturer / gov't figures - who's to judge Mr stiff upper lip wasn't being a little conservative!? ![]() My "impartial"!! personal review was based on the evidence "I" experienced and not on some drag race. It just did not feel any quicker. If I had the opportunity to side by side them, then maybe it would be obvious and the "10 car lengths" statement would run home. Something you have obviously tried, but something I have not viewed with these 35 year old eyes. ![]() WRT the Ferrari vs. Fiat statement, well yes possibly, if you are referring to a Fiat 127, but lets face it and I cringe at the comparison here, its more a Fiat Coupe 2.0 Turbo than a 127....note to self, go for electro testie therapy for even daring to compare such a monster with the beauty of the LR RRS! ![]() At the end of the day, i was referring to the overall package and in my book, the RRS smacks the Porsche straight in the choppers on all counts (2 seconds or not) !! ![]() 5 series for the miles ![]() RRS S/C factory built HST - Gone 45 others have been and gone! |
||
![]() |
|
tf9 Member Since: 07 Jun 2006 Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 643 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Btw, i also prefer my rrs overall |
||
![]() |
|
will_wonka Member Since: 03 Mar 2007 Location: Tminus 12 months for the RS Sport Supercharged!! Posts: 3377 ![]() ![]() |
Excellent |
||
![]() |
|
Cornelius Vermuyden Member Since: 15 Aug 2006 Location: The Far Canal Posts: 190 ![]() ![]() |
With respect,will_wonka, if you have only a re-mapped ECU you are most unlikely to have anything remotely near 430bhp! Even if your standard engine had something approaching the optimistic 385bhp claimed by Land Rover, a simple "entry-level" re-map categorically will not give you those stated figures. In order to get 430-440bhp as installed (NOT on the dyno) you would need a modified blower drive, de-restricted cats, itg air filter (or similar) and a tidied up inlet tract. tf9 may well have these mods, of course, oligarchic Muscovite cars seem to have everything available these days!!
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d49cf/d49cfc835ffefa2c9e3f1d6b13d1b3797c34c12f" alt=""