RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Technical > Chipping Tdv8 |
|
|
tasmod Member Since: 07 Aug 2005 Location: NE Lincs Posts: 396 |
== |
||
Wed Mar 28 2007 8:12pm |
|
beast Member Since: 19 Mar 2007 Location: crewe Posts: 6 |
Thanks for all the help guys, sorry i did not reply sooner ! been away for acouple of days |
||
Thu Mar 29 2007 11:54am |
|
Nutty Nige Member Since: 21 Feb 2007 Location: Staffordshire Posts: 355 |
The only comment would be the transfer box is probably the weakest point at the min, and by adding 110NM to the Torque figure, its then got to take 750NM when the upgrade is done.
|
||
Thu Mar 29 2007 1:12pm |
|
rrsjo Member Since: 28 Nov 2006 Location: North Cambs Posts: 551 |
Are you in the know at LR? Gone - 2008 TDV8, Stornoway Grey, ebony, zabrano trim, TV, Tasmods, mudflaps. |
||
Thu Mar 29 2007 1:45pm |
|
Nutty Nige Member Since: 21 Feb 2007 Location: Staffordshire Posts: 355 |
No Sorry not guilty
|
||
Thu Mar 29 2007 2:03pm |
|
rrsjo Member Since: 28 Nov 2006 Location: North Cambs Posts: 551 |
So are you saying Nigel, that from your line of work you have been able to establish that the limits of the RRS transfer box will be reached - or even exceeded, if chipping produces an extra 110 Nm of torque? Or as a transmission engineer, do you just have concerns that this may be a possible issue, as the transmission must have an upper limit somewhere? Sorry to drive this point home, but I think it important that any reliable source for identifying potential problems, should be highlighted before some of us learn the hard (expensive) way. Gone - 2008 TDV8, Stornoway Grey, ebony, zabrano trim, TV, Tasmods, mudflaps. |
||
Thu Mar 29 2007 4:49pm |
|
Nutty Nige Member Since: 21 Feb 2007 Location: Staffordshire Posts: 355 |
Well I work on the Elcetronics side in the aftermarket sector. Next door we have on projects for compamies like Ford, GM, Vauxhall, Vansco, Daimler Chrysler, etc on ECU re-manufacture, dashboard panels, excavator electronics CD players, most on board vehicle electronics etc.
|
||
Fri Mar 30 2007 8:03am |
|
shmoogle Member Since: 07 Sep 2005 Location: ... and for every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you! Posts: 24350 |
Interesting Nige!
|
||
Fri Mar 30 2007 8:07am |
|
rrsjo Member Since: 28 Nov 2006 Location: North Cambs Posts: 551 |
Thanks very much for the above clarification Nigel. So it would appear NOT to be over the limit at 750 Nm (but close). Therefore, in theory, if it went bang during the warranty period, the dealer could not attribute the cause to the chip upgrade. So it would appear to be pretty important for the supplier of the chip upgrade to have published torque figures available for the relevant engine chip upgrade - and which have been carried out on a calibrated dyno. Gone - 2008 TDV8, Stornoway Grey, ebony, zabrano trim, TV, Tasmods, mudflaps. |
||
Fri Mar 30 2007 8:28am |
|
Nutty Nige Member Since: 21 Feb 2007 Location: Staffordshire Posts: 355 |
Yes but I am sure that in a court of law the warranty would only refer to a standard vehicle, NOT an up-graded one.
|
||
Fri Mar 30 2007 8:53am |
|
tasmod Member Since: 07 Aug 2005 Location: NE Lincs Posts: 396 |
=== |
||
Fri Mar 30 2007 9:42am |
|
Nutty Nige Member Since: 21 Feb 2007 Location: Staffordshire Posts: 355 |
Hi Rob
|
||
Fri Mar 30 2007 10:43am |
|
rrsjo Member Since: 28 Nov 2006 Location: North Cambs Posts: 551 |
So it would appear that Superchips published dyno figure of 798Nm of torque for the TDV8 might be pushing things a little too far. It might also mean a lot of black smoke and soot from the exhaust as well!
|
||
Fri Mar 30 2007 12:09pm |
|
simonsi Member Since: 01 Dec 2006 Location: Leicester Posts: 259 |
I've no idea what the torque capacity of the transfer box is but surely it must be able to cope with the engine torque multiplied by the ratio in low range 1st??? Consequently there is probbaly lots of torque capacity spare whilst in high range? Earlier electronic LR's remap the throttle response in low range, partially to give better controllability but maybe also to reduce the max torque available - on an auto very easy to have different max engine torque depending on which gear is engaged....
|
||
Fri Mar 30 2007 12:17pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis