|
|
||
RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
| Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
| Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
 | Home > General > RRS & Disco 4 |
 
|
|
|
|
| Disco_Mikey Member Since: 08 Apr 2012 Location: Dundee, Scotland Posts: 4403   
|
Yes, just the Sport is 6 inches shorter, and usually has ARC/DR fitted |
||
Sun Jan 19 2020 11:36am |
|
| Dave B Member Since: 10 Oct 2019 Location: East/West Sussex Coast Borders Posts: 431
|
Thank you, that makes life a whole lot easier. 2010 3.6 TDV8 HSE (Gone)
|
||
|
Sun Jan 19 2020 2:25pm |
|
| Tyrefitter Member Since: 19 Jul 2015 Location: Bridlington East Yorkshire Posts: 3677 
|
That’s surprised me,I always thought the disco was shorter,well it does look shorter. Andy. 21 Ford Ranger Gone but not forgotten Focus RS Red Edition 2015 RRS AB Fuji. 2014 RRS SC Santorini 2016 VW Amarok 2014 RRS AB Fuji 2012 RRS Red Edition Fuji 2015 Nissan Navara 2012 RRS SE Santorini 2008 RRS White 2007 RRS Santorino |
||
|
Sun Jan 19 2020 3:42pm |
|
| Dave-t Member Since: 18 Jan 2020 Location: Glasgow Posts: 436
|
that's the old shape |
||
|
Sun Jan 19 2020 4:22pm |
|
| Pufftmw Member Since: 23 May 2012 Location: Carmarthenshire Posts: 1052 
|
Hence why there's loads of off-roading bits for Discos but not so many for RRS's. Some have said that due to shorter length, an RRS is better suited to off-road than a Disco - but try telling that to a Disco owner |
||
|
Sun Jan 19 2020 7:04pm |
|
| RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8987 
|
They're actually remarkably similar in size. The big difference is in the wheelbase which is 5 inches longer in the Disco, but the Disco is less than 2 inches overall longer than the RRS. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
|
||
|
Sun Jan 19 2020 9:34pm |
|
| Tyrefitter Member Since: 19 Jul 2015 Location: Bridlington East Yorkshire Posts: 3677
|
pufftmw,hence the reason why farmers only used to buy swb Landrover’s Andy.
|
||
|
Sun Jan 19 2020 9:36pm |
|
| RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8987
|
Most farmers don't "off road" though, in the sense of needing the ultimate ability of the vehicle. Most just need a 4x4 that can have crap thrown in the back and drive across fields/along tracks. The 90 was great for that. Where bigger loads are required, the Japanese pickups are a much better bet than a 110 would be. Hence the 90 was the farmer's choice over the 110. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
|
||
|
Sun Jan 19 2020 10:37pm |
|
| HughN Member Since: 10 Sep 2017 Location: Near Llanybydder Posts: 651 
|
And the RRS is lighter... |
||
|
Mon Jan 20 2020 12:19pm |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
