RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General > 4.2 RRS Supercharged or Cayenne Turbo |
|
|
tom0311 Member Since: 01 Apr 2016 Location: witney Posts: 240 |
I have never owned a Cayenne but I've driven one. Long time ago now. The interiors are crap IMO, and still are even in the £18-24k range when I was looking around before buying my 5.0 SC. RRS wins the interior and exterior looks hands down. The Cayenne is just so ugly. I can't imagine parking one, walking away and turning round for another look. I do that regularly with my RRS. |
||
Mon May 14 2018 6:48pm |
|
Hoople Member Since: 14 Jun 2012 Location: London Posts: 16 |
The RRS looks better for sure, the later facelifted interior of the RRS looks really smart and modern still but the earlier ones (2005 ish for both cars) I sort of think the Porsche one looks more modern than the early RRS.
|
||
Mon May 14 2018 6:56pm |
|
tom0311 Member Since: 01 Apr 2016 Location: witney Posts: 240 |
Probably right about the 2005 Porsche looking more modern, but the RRS IMO is a nicer place to sit. You just can't beat the arm rests and seats. I had the old interior for over a year and honestly preferred sitting there than I did in my 2015 Mercedes C250 which had a fantastic interior. The LCD radio leaves a lot to be desired looks wise, but the 2005 Cayenne isn't up to much in that area either from what I remember. The Cayenne turbo is certainly very quick!
|
||
Mon May 14 2018 7:13pm |
|
Paulsinhis30s Member Since: 12 Jan 2018 Location: Wiltshire Posts: 20 |
I went through the exact same loop, changed jobs, mileage went sub 10k a year, decided that it was time for a loud, thirsty comfortable petrol.
|
||
Mon May 14 2018 9:43pm |
|
Themoog Member Since: 27 Apr 2018 Location: Cambridge Posts: 262 |
Having owned a Cayenne of 2004 and now an 05 RRSS I can tell you that the RR is way better inside. My Cayenne as not a Turbo but it still went like stink. I found the Porsche interior fragile with heating vent grills breaking etc whereas the RR is much better.
|
||
Tue May 15 2018 6:43am |
|
Hoople Member Since: 14 Jun 2012 Location: London Posts: 16 |
This is the problem, I quite like both cars, my last RR needed a few bits doing, most of which to be fair were wear and tear things like lower arms, discs and pads etc, which is fine.
|
||
Tue May 15 2018 11:21am |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 |
Would emissions not be a big issue for both cars in the London area? Both are old cars now and had pretty breathtaking emissions when they were new......... 2020 Pangea Green 1st Edition D240 New Defender 110 is here and loving it
|
||
Tue May 15 2018 11:26am |
|
kismet110 Member Since: 09 Oct 2010 Location: London Posts: 382 |
Before plunging for a new RRS I was in a similar dilemma to you.
|
||
Tue May 15 2018 11:55am |
|
Hoople Member Since: 14 Jun 2012 Location: London Posts: 16 |
The limits for petrol cars is Euro 4, both for the T Charge and upcoming ULEZ, whereas for diesels it is Euro 6, any petrol around 2005 or later is fine, whereas for diesels it’s 2015. |
||
Tue May 15 2018 1:18pm |
|
Cymruambyth Member Since: 27 Feb 2017 Location: North Wales Posts: 1533 |
Looks wise....the RR wins hands down for me. I`ve always looked admiringly at Sports...Cayenne have never even been worth a glance for me. I`d personally rather sacrifice a little power for a more aesthetically pleasing vehicle Steve. |
||
Tue May 15 2018 9:01pm |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 |
Nobody prepared to comment on the offroad capablities of both cars then? Cayenne is basically a Touareg underneath and is very good offroad but like RRS you rarely see one where it was designed to go............. 2020 Pangea Green 1st Edition D240 New Defender 110 is here and loving it
|
||
Wed May 16 2018 7:50am |
|
tom0311 Member Since: 01 Apr 2016 Location: witney Posts: 240 |
Good point Tim - I don't really challenge mine off road (apart from when we go camping), but the roads in West Oxfordshire are so bad it's basically off-roading whenever I leave the house at this point. |
||
Wed May 16 2018 8:15am |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8974 |
The gearbox shouldn't fail at 100k just because the fluid is original. It might get arsey and play about but fail, no. LR state 150k miles between gearbox fluid changes. ZF now recommend about 75k as the change point. Of course, if they had done a lot of heavy towing then the gearbox would have needed new oil much sooner. I wonder if someone either put the wrong fluid in it, or it suffered from an early problem which was coolant getting in to the system. The radiator design on the 2.7 (and the petrols possibly) meant that occasionally there would be a leak between the cooling system and the transmission resulting in contamination of the gearbox oil. If you get another RRS, factor in a transmission fluid change at around 60-70k miles. Do the transfer box and diffs too - although I think they are done at shorter intervals than the gearbox anyway. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders 2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed |
||
Wed May 16 2018 8:36am |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8974 |
Good point Tim. On one of the "drive your own" trips I did at Eastnor a few years ago, there was a Touareg in the group (the only non-LR). He did everything we did except the wading trenches. He spoke to the instructors and neither he nor they were sure of the wading limits of the vehicle so he sensibly avoided the deeper water. Otherwise, he got around fine. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders 2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed |
||
Wed May 16 2018 8:39am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis