RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > Technical > What to look for mechanically - early 4.2 S/C |
|
|
shepp Member Since: 15 Nov 2010 Location: Bingley Posts: 440 |
Hello Tim
|
||
Mon May 29 2017 6:57pm |
|
geoffsnook Member Since: 19 Nov 2016 Location: cardiff Posts: 1699 |
Exactly shepp just changed mine what a the back two are is also have a slight misfire on mine(electrical/coils as its intermittent) it is gas converted but has no vsr if you buy one with lpg make sure it has a valve lub system and no misfire's other than that it is just the normal electrics you should check and mechanical s but as you have a range you know what you need to check and make sure the supercharger does not rattle |
||
Mon May 29 2017 7:06pm |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 |
Thanks guys, useful info and will check when I go to look at it. As the car will not be a daily runner or even a weekend toy I am unlikely to rack up huge miles in it - the car I'm interested in is a pre-production car that escaped the LR crusher. 2020 Pangea Green 1st Edition D240 New Defender 110 is here and loving it
|
||
Tue May 30 2017 8:15am |
|
Andy K Member Since: 18 Sep 2015 Location: GL Posts: 4940 |
4.4 SC ? |
||
Tue May 30 2017 11:02am |
|
Tim in Scotland Member Since: 30 May 2005 Location: Driving along in my automobile Posts: 17476 |
Yes there were 4 or 5 preproduction developement mule 4.4 S/C's made and run, supposed to have been crushed after longevity issues with the engine was revealed and it was canned in favour of the 4.2 before launch. The owner of the old LRE at Dunkeld had one of them for a while, it was Giverny Green like my 2.7SE 2020 Pangea Green 1st Edition D240 New Defender 110 is here and loving it
|
||
Tue May 30 2017 12:59pm |
|
Socast Member Since: 25 Sep 2014 Location: Somerset Posts: 594 |
The 4.4 is the same engine as the 4.2 but with thicker bore liners. They found that with the increased compression it was stressing the liners too much, hence dropping in thicker liners and causing the lower cubic capacity to 4.2.
|
||
Mon Jun 05 2017 10:56am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis