RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > My Range Rover Sport > My first RRS. |
|
|
grey17 Member Since: 18 Jul 2016 Location: London Posts: 62 |
|
||
Mon Jul 18 2016 3:33pm |
|
Andy K Member Since: 18 Sep 2015 Location: GL Posts: 4946 |
27 MPG ? Were you doing 50MPH ? |
||
Mon Jul 18 2016 7:28pm |
|
Tyrefitter Member Since: 19 Jul 2015 Location: Bridlington East Yorkshire Posts: 3677 |
I've never got 27 out of my 2012 3.0 diesel.looks a nice motor for a 2006.
|
||
Mon Jul 18 2016 8:24pm |
|
grey17 Member Since: 18 Jul 2016 Location: London Posts: 62 |
Hi Devon. Many thanks for the welcome Are you from that County? |
||
Mon Jul 18 2016 8:43pm |
|
grey17 Member Since: 18 Jul 2016 Location: London Posts: 62 |
Hi Andy. I was doing around 70 give or take a bit the whole way home. I did notice a big difference in the figures as the fuel burned off. I brimmed it when I left and struggled to get 22mpg but as the needle slowly came down the gauge, so the figures went up. At half a tank, going along on the flat on the M4 it indicating 27-29 mpg. Tyre pressures were checked at the garage and 35psi all 'round giving a slightly firmer ride than normal. I decided to do a little research on the weight of petrol and how much this affects performance. One litre of petrol weighs 0.711kg and the Sport has a 88 ltr capacity. If you roughly halve that to 44 ltrs and multiply by 0.711 you get about 31kg of fuel, 60 odd kg when full which is a lot of weight. In a separate test, I dropped my full size spare wheel off (32kg) and this had a similar positive and very healthy effect on the few consumption. I may go for a space saver to try and reduce the weight a bit. The really annoying things are those harmonic balance weights swinging from the rear end! Now if I could loose those we'd be really talking |
||
Mon Jul 18 2016 9:03pm |
|
grey17 Member Since: 18 Jul 2016 Location: London Posts: 62 |
Hi Andy. Thanks for your message. I was beginning to think I'd done the wrong thing in buying a petrol but I'm starting to think otherwise now! Any ideas what the TDV8 is like around town and on a run? Cheers. |
||
Mon Jul 18 2016 9:05pm |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8980 |
You bought a 2.5 tonne, large capacity engine 4x4 and you're thinking of trying to save fuel by cutting off a handful of kg? You don't think that perhaps you bought the wrong vehicle in the first place? A nice 60mpg Focus diesel sounds more like it... Anyway, did you get your mpg figure from the onboard computer? Don't necessarily trust it too much. Oh, and your RRS looks very nice. Nice and unmolested. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders 2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed |
||
Mon Jul 18 2016 9:18pm |
|
DEVON Member Since: 14 Apr 2016 Location: Bolton Posts: 264 |
Hi Devon.
|
||
Mon Jul 18 2016 11:24pm |
|
grey17 Member Since: 18 Jul 2016 Location: London Posts: 62 |
Good morning RRSTDV8 Thanks for your reply, good to hear your views! You would be staggered at the difference it makes by removing excess weight from your motor, seriously. I checked the fuel computers accuracy on paper when I bought it to compare with how it reads on the car and it was very close, actually reading under so happy with that. As a rough example, I bet you are most likely running with 20" rims? Supercharged rims possibly? These weight in at 22kg each making 88kg in unsprung weight. My 19" rims weight 15.4kg making 61.6kg unsprung. The difference is 26.4kg already and thats just a start with the wheels and is similar to driving around with a second spare wheel. Compomotive PD1880 alloys come in at 12kg so you can see its easy to shed weight quick. Drop your spare wheel off for a day and see the difference I grew up with Land Rovers so I know all about their foibles but love 'em all the same. Have a great day! |
||
Tue Jul 19 2016 6:57am |
|
grey17 Member Since: 18 Jul 2016 Location: London Posts: 62 |
Good morning RRSTDV8 Thanks for your reply, good to hear your views! You would be staggered at the difference it makes by removing excess weight from your motor, seriously. I checked the fuel computers accuracy on paper when I bought it to compare with how it reads on the car and it was very close, actually reading under so happy with that. As a rough example, I bet you are most likely running with 20" rims? Supercharged rims possibly? These weight in at 22kg each making 88kg in unsprung weight. My 19" rims weight 15.4kg making 61.6kg unsprung. The difference is 26.4kg already and thats just a start with the wheels and is similar to driving around with a second spare wheel. Compomotive PD1880 alloys come in at 12kg so you can see its easy to shed weight quick. Drop your spare wheel off for a day and see the difference I grew up with Land Rovers so I know all about their foibles but love 'em all the same. Have a great day! |
||
Tue Jul 19 2016 7:01am |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8980 |
I run 19in rims with AT tyres. Any savings from a 10kg weight change are likely dwarfed by the loss caused by the ATs.
|
||
Tue Jul 19 2016 8:27am |
|
grey17 Member Since: 18 Jul 2016 Location: London Posts: 62 |
Ah well, AT tyres do make a difference and each to their own.
|
||
Tue Jul 19 2016 8:36am |
|
Slim444 Member Since: 09 Nov 2015 Location: Huntingdon Posts: 200 |
I ran 19's with ice and snow tyres on over winter (and beyond) and it raped the fuel consumption, about 10% more than with 20's wearing Hankook boots. Then again, to be expected!
|
||
Tue Jul 19 2016 10:28am |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8980 |
I run 255/55/19 Grabber AT at the moment and I get maybe 22mpg over all. On a steady run with not too much acceleration that goes up to maybe 26mpg. I'd expect a couple of mpg improvement if running on road rubber.
|
||
Tue Jul 19 2016 11:53am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis