RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
Home > General (L494) > Range Rover Sport SVR vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo track battle |
|
|
DBA Member Since: 20 Mar 2013 Location: Skopje Posts: 51 |
|
||
Wed Apr 15 2015 10:07am |
|
philmw Member Since: 18 Aug 2006 Location: Nottingham Posts: 1671 |
|||
Wed Apr 15 2015 10:17am |
|
DBA Member Since: 20 Mar 2013 Location: Skopje Posts: 51 |
As I understood, when taking both the video and the text review, the Cayenne is a better handling car, but the SVR looks better and has overall better image, which as said is most important in this category (high performance SUVs), so that's why it wins in the text review.
|
||
Wed Apr 15 2015 2:04pm |
|
Fletcher Member Since: 28 Jan 2015 Location: Devon Posts: 481 |
We had the porsche on demo , as an SUV I didn't like it , it just didn't feel like it was worth the money , if you want a car for out and out racing or for the track you would go for a gt3.
|
||
Thu Apr 16 2015 6:07pm |
|
Mark_N Member Since: 09 Aug 2013 Location: London Posts: 1102 |
I do agree, it's completely academic. What I can say is the SVR wants for nothing in everyday driving and, in particular, its ability to overtake a line of cars safely and without drama is amazing.
|
||
Thu Apr 16 2015 7:44pm |
|
RRSman Member Since: 10 Feb 2015 Location: London Posts: 1439 |
So in the speed stakes the Cayenne murdered the SVR - surprising! I'd still have the SVR over the Cayenene anyday. I had a diesel it was a great car but very fussy inside with all those buttons and I think my RRS is a way better car. |
||
Fri Apr 17 2015 3:44pm |
|
oldcro Member Since: 25 Aug 2010 Location: Shetland Posts: 359 |
I always wanted a Range Rover so bought a RRS which was fine but was not a proper Range Rover. So I then bought a Range Rover Westminster which was fine except it had so many options I never used and the dealership was terrible ( how do you know a dealer is Lying? his lips are moving springs to mind).
|
||
Fri Apr 17 2015 4:28pm |
|
Chrisr1806 Member Since: 23 Jun 2013 Location: Sussex Posts: 683 |
So I assume you can forgive it's awful looks then? Arrived: MY16 A/B SDV6 in Aruba, Ivory interior, piano black trim, black panoramic roof, spare wheel, blind spot monitoring, mudlaps and more...
|
||
Fri Apr 17 2015 5:49pm |
|
philmw Member Since: 18 Aug 2006 Location: Nottingham Posts: 1671 |
This month's Top Gear mag says things like "The Sport SVR makes a noise like a skyful of marauding Spitfires" and "The SVR throws itselfs down the road with almost apocalyptic abandon"
|
||
Fri Apr 17 2015 7:47pm |
|
Baco Member Since: 13 Aug 2013 Location: Belgium Posts: 154 |
Oh, it's that guy again... He probably starts drooling instantly when you mention Porsche, lol. I knew the outcome as soon as I saw it was him... No fan of the Cayenne here, neither inside (way too many buttons) nor outside. It doesn't have the posture/presence of the RRS either. Ah well, personal preference, I guess |
||
Sat Apr 18 2015 7:48pm |
|
Mark_N Member Since: 09 Aug 2013 Location: London Posts: 1102 |
Not sure that 2.5 seconds faster round a track when being driven by someone who has a track record of bias towards Porsche counts as being "murdered". I do accept that the Cayenne appears to corner more tidily but it's not so relevant to everyday driving. What did surprise me was being left behind by an Audi TT RS yesterday, boy was it going. I took off from a roundabout, him behind me. I was full bore in the SVR in sport mode and this thing just swept past, yet on paper, they are comparable to 60, not sure what was going on. Edit, I expect the extra tonne or so the SVR is lugging around is not fully compensated for by the extra 200 bhp... Mark SVR in Estoril Blue |
||
Sun Apr 19 2015 9:06am |
|
RRSTDV8 Member Since: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 8971 |
A good example of headline figures not giving the full picture, I guess. The TT produces peak torque at 1500rpm and keeps it all the way to about 5500rpm. So it's producing good low end power as well as the nice headline figure and it's got a linear power delivery. I believe the Jag-sourced engine in yours takes longer to get going so he's getting a head start on you, in effect. As you say, the weight issue will also be a factor. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders 2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed |
||
Sun Apr 19 2015 9:53am |
|
philmw Member Since: 18 Aug 2006 Location: Nottingham Posts: 1671 |
And Mark you're still running yours in. |
||
Sun Apr 19 2015 10:00am |
|
Mark_N Member Since: 09 Aug 2013 Location: London Posts: 1102 |
Nearly 3000 miles now... Mark
|
||
Sun Apr 19 2015 10:02am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis