RRSPORT.CO.UK

    Forum   Gallery   Shop   Sponsors
Home > General > 5.0 Supercharged v 2009 Merc SL500 (Facelift)
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
 
JKay



Member Since: 17 Nov 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 127

Australia 
5.0 Supercharged v 2009 Merc SL500 (Facelift)

Two completely different cars I know but interested in hearing particularly frm people who own or have driven both.

Space isnt really an issue to me and Im just looking for a powerful luxurious cruiser which feels like an occasion everytime I drive it. Not looking for a pure sports car.

I understand this is an RR forum so views might be biased, but If space wasnt an issue for some owners here would you prefer the SL instead?

Any opinions appreciated
Cheers
Jordan

Post #334610 Thu Mar 01 2012 9:45am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
CycleSi



Member Since: 25 Sep 2010
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 51

2007 Range Rover Sport TDV8 HSE Stornoway Grey

l've just gone from a SL55 AMG (had it 3 years) to a RRS 3.6 TDV8.

Obviously they are completely different so there is almost no way of comparing them but they both give a real sense of occasion when driving them. l'm surprised how much l like the RRS.

Post #334612 Thu Mar 01 2012 9:56am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JKay



Member Since: 17 Nov 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 127

Australia 

Cheers Si do you miss the speed of the SL?

Post #334619 Thu Mar 01 2012 10:12am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Misery



Member Since: 07 Dec 2005
Location: Waiting for L405
Posts: 2555

United Kingdom 

JKay

I have a really good bank manager Very Happy and am lucky enough to have a 4.2SC and a SL55. As cycleSi says they are completely different cars, both excellent to drive.

My opinion might be biased as I really love the LR brand. The SL is a stunning car, but you are very limited with its use, personally if I had to choice one or the other it would definitely be the RR a better all round usable car and still very exciting.

I hope this helps

Post #334675 Thu Mar 01 2012 2:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
JKay



Member Since: 17 Nov 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 127

Australia 

Thanks Misery,

Licky bastard Laughing

Youve probably talked some sense into me. This car will be my only car so guess might be silly to go for the SL. However do really like the SL and will probably have to own one at some point. As soon as my current car is sold ill be looking for a 5.0 SC. Cant wait

Post #334680 Thu Mar 01 2012 3:39pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Misery



Member Since: 07 Dec 2005
Location: Waiting for L405
Posts: 2555

United Kingdom 

Wink Excellent choice I'm not that lucky as I only have a little old 4.2 I have driven the 5ltr and it is a beast you will not be disapointed.

Yes you must own one, but go for a 55 there is no better noise, I am sure the Germans made it sound like a Spitfire on purpose. Laughing

Post #334701 Thu Mar 01 2012 5:11pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
JKay



Member Since: 17 Nov 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 127

Australia 

Good to know its powerful as Ill be coming from an Evo9 so will need something to still give me a rush, albeit not as manic as the Evo

Cheers
Jkay

But niw u mention the sound of the SL ur swaying me again lol. Im hoping the 5.0 decatted will sound nice

Post #334705 Thu Mar 01 2012 5:30pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Misery



Member Since: 07 Dec 2005
Location: Waiting for L405
Posts: 2555

United Kingdom 

You will get a rush from the SC, rest assured on that. it will also be a lot more comfortable. Thumbs Up

Yes get a decent aftermarket exhaust on the SC and the job will be done. Good luck and post photo's

Post #334734 Thu Mar 01 2012 8:12pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
JKay



Member Since: 17 Nov 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 127

Australia 

Thanks Misery. Will do Thumbs Up

Post #334771 Fri Mar 02 2012 1:38am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
CycleSi



Member Since: 25 Sep 2010
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 51

2007 Range Rover Sport TDV8 HSE Stornoway Grey

Of course l miss the speed of it. It was running 603 bhp & 624 lbft when l sold it so (despite its weight) it was fairly lively to say the least. The folding roof was epic too. However, l did have a lot of warranty work done on it by MB which was disappointing considering it was £117k new.

The bizarre thing though is the RRS is a totally different beast and seems to waft down the road on a wave of torque so the 'performance drop' doesn't feel that noticeable.

My advice is to buy BOTH !!!

Post #334819 Fri Mar 02 2012 11:18am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Misery



Member Since: 07 Dec 2005
Location: Waiting for L405
Posts: 2555

United Kingdom 

CycleSi was the warranty work on the roof leaking by any chance??

Post #334835 Fri Mar 02 2012 12:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
CycleSi



Member Since: 25 Sep 2010
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 51

2007 Range Rover Sport TDV8 HSE Stornoway Grey

Surprisingly not.

I had £11500 of warranty work done in 3 years:

Exhausts - both.
Fuel tank - replaced.
Front struts - replaced.
Various steering components replaced.
God knows what else !

Thank god for MB Tier 1 warranty.

Post #334836 Fri Mar 02 2012 12:11pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
andman



Member Since: 08 Oct 2011
Location: la vella
Posts: 1155

Andorra 2011 Range Rover Sport 3.0 TDV6 HSE Fuji White

I had one of the first SL55's back in 03...and all I can say ... it was a beast... lovely noise gr8 torque and like Censored off a shovel off the line....
if it's got to be a 500 then the RRS has got to be very much in contention..... but if you really and I mean really don't need the space and practicality then purely on the convertible aspect.... which truly is a joy.... then its a close call with poss the SL nudging it...
You can barely fit a weekend bag in the SL with the roof down !!
Tough call... I'm fortunate enough to always have a 2 seater sports conv as well as a 4x4...

Just to confuse you even more..... you can always chip the RRS.... now that sounds like a lot of dangerous fun !!

Good luck and let us know what you decide.... 2014.5 SDV6 AB Dynamic ... Fuji /Santorini Pan roof and 22's
2013 Porsche Boxster S 3.4
2014 Audi A3 S line Quattro
---------------------------------

Post #334841 Fri Mar 02 2012 12:51pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JKay



Member Since: 17 Nov 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 127

Australia 

I would love both but Ive moved to Malaysia for work and even an SL300 here retails at around £160k new and a Range Sport SC roughly £135k new with tax at over £2k a year. I will not be buying new thats for sure but used prices are still pretty high.
Panning to get a nice used example from the UK and have it shipped over, pay relevant taxes etc which should still work out cheaper.


Even tho I dont need the space (single no kids etc) it will be my only car (in addition to a scooter for putting around for short trips in bad traffic).

The torque of the Rangie sounds great. Currently have an evo9 and the turbo lag is annoying.

Post #334847 Fri Mar 02 2012 1:16pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
RRSPORT.CO.UK RSS Feed - All Forums

Switch to Mobile site